Many thanks for all the answers and point of views!
I have now good elements for digging the subject.
Thanks a lot,
Kader
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > I would like to have your opinions about open source databases versus
> > commercial ones. I had a _serious_ debate with some of my colleagues
> > about open source in general but when I started to compare mysql to
> > oracle, they literally fired at me as if I had made a blasphemy... They
> >
On Thursday 24 July 2003 08:45 am, ETI - Barry Irchad Kader wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This message may be off topic and I apologize a lot if so.
>
> I would like to have your opinions about open source databases versus
> commercial ones. I had a _serious_ debate with some of my colleagues
> about open sourc
ZHello,
The best argument for using postgresql in place of Oracle is that the
latest
Oracle has lots and lots of feutures which one normally do not need.
It is expencive and is normally only required for large multi-national
companies.
hth
Willem
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, ETI - Barry Irchad Kader wr
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:45:40PM +, ETI - Barry Irchad Kader wrote:
> They are stating that Oracle is above any comparison and that it is
> the must in the universe of relational databases.
> [...]
> Do you know any benchmark results that made this kind of comparison?
One difference is that
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:45:40PM +, ETI - Barry Irchad Kader wrote:
> I would like to have your opinions about open source databases versus
> commercial ones. I had a _serious_ debate with some of my colleagues
> about open source in general but when I started to compare mysql to
> oracle, th
Hi!
This message may be off topic and I apologize a lot if so.
I would like to have your opinions about open source databases versus
commercial ones. I had a _serious_ debate with some of my colleagues
about open source in general but when I started to compare mysql to
oracle, they literally fir
