> I think you may not fully understand the Unix security model. Unix is
> a multi-user system; Windows is not.
I understand that...:).I just wasn't aware that scheemers (
virus makers whatever ) were "able" to infect even a root user ( which
at moment i am not --yes dave/grandpa no
then
one person needs admin type rights?
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "David Talkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: r00t! [WAS]Re: no printer
> In most cases on a stable system, however,
Hidong Kim wrote:
>
> Are the parport and parport_pc modules installed? What does 'lsmod'
> show?
lsmod shows:
parport_probe
parport
there are more but those are applicable ones...
so this parport_pc is required huh.? i'll have a look in kerne.
anyway thanks for email
lee
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
lee johnson wrote:
>alot of folks run root and to think the only reason we can't is because
>of something that linux 'was' protecting us from what windows suffered
>from ie: virus's..well then that is sad day indeed...
I think you may not fully understand
elite hacker/virus skills
> what is "31337 h4ck3r/v19u5" stuff ?..security does matter but i also
> "HATE" the "NUSIANCE" of what root makes me deal with to do anything
> productive.
>
> alot of folks run root and to think the only reason we can't is because
> of something that linux 'was' protec
> Dear root,
dear root forgot to "edit" his netscape preferences before sending
thereby .
>
> Thank you for co-operating with my 31337 h4ck3r/v19u5 w9171ng 5ki11s. If I could get
>a few more people like you to run as root all the time (because hey, security doesn't
>matter!), then I'll kn
Are the parport and parport_pc modules installed? What does 'lsmod'
show?
> At 04:18 PM 4/19/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >i just re-formatted/re-installed redhat 7 onto my partition ( no server
> >) as i was having trouble printing and could not diagnose so i thought
> >re-installing would clinch
Dear root,
Thank you for co-operating with my 31337 h4ck3r/v19u5 w9171ng 5ki11s. If I could get a
few more people like you to run as root all the time (because hey, security doesn't
matter!), then I'll know for sure that my next netscape mailer virii will be able to
wreak havok on all the Linu
i just re-formatted/re-installed redhat 7 onto my partition ( no server
) as i was having trouble printing and could not diagnose so i thought
re-installing would clinch it...
nopewhen i run printtool I still get "not detected" on all ports
this very printer has worked in redhat before..
: "Michael Ghens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 10:00 AM
Subject: No printer
> I have been having troubles getting the printer
going. I have a printer> connected to a parallel port. > >
These are the messages I have in /va
I have been having troubles getting the printer going. I have a printer
connected to a parallel port.
These are the messages I have in /var/log/messages
Apr 6 06:54:25 anchovy insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.14/misc/lp.o:
init_module: Device or resource busy
Apr 6 06:54:25 anchovy kernel: lp: no dev
Hello Joe,
Add this line to your /etc/conf.modules
alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I successfully installed RH 6.1, but forgot to turn on my printer
> before the install. I've tried using pri
Hi all,
I successfully installed RH 6.1, but forgot to turn on my printer
before the install. I've tried using printtool to get it going since,
but it doesn't seem to be found. I've set it to both /dev/lp0 and
/dev/lp1 without success. Its an Epson Color 640 pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
