Re: [RHL] test cycle for bind 9?

2000-10-05 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote: Thoughts about a turn-around/test-cycle for inclusion in the errata for Guinness? I don't think bind9 is an errata candidate for previous releases because it doesn't have all the functionality bind8 had (yet). There are also a couple of

RE: [RHL] test cycle for bind 9?

2000-10-05 Thread Juha Saarinen
%- I don't think bind9 is an errata candidate for previous releases because %- it doesn't have all the functionality bind8 had (yet). %- %- There are also a couple of non-critical bugs that need fixing, e.g. in %- bind-utils: %- [root@bero /root]# host www.redhat.com %- socket.c:1183: