On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
Thoughts about a turn-around/test-cycle for inclusion in the errata for
Guinness?
I don't think bind9 is an errata candidate for previous releases because
it doesn't have all the functionality bind8 had (yet).
There are also a couple of
%- I don't think bind9 is an errata candidate for previous releases because
%- it doesn't have all the functionality bind8 had (yet).
%-
%- There are also a couple of non-critical bugs that need fixing, e.g. in
%- bind-utils:
%- [root@bero /root]# host www.redhat.com
%- socket.c:1183: