-Original Message-
From: Andrej Todosic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 24, 1998 1:09 PM
Subject: 5.1 on redhat site ?!?!?!
>i saw a word manhattan ? ( as oppose to hurricane ) am i righrt ?
What will 5.2 be, an island or a city?
--
> Strangest is still that they ship a not yet stable (pre-) version of
> 2.0.34.
Well, now that Alan is working for RH, I suspect he'll make sure it's stable
before releasing. I agree, though. That sure would be a show-stopper if the
kernel wasn't stable..
Dave
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat
On Sun, 24 May 1998, Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> On 24-May-98 Andrej Todosic wrote:
> > hey ,
> >
> > i was just browsing through package listings for redhat 5.0 ,
> > and they all point to /redhat-5.1 which doesnt exist .. and the versions
> > are not
> > the ones that 5.0 comes with ...
> > h
On 24-May-98 Andrej Todosic wrote:
> hey ,
>
> i was just browsing through package listings for redhat 5.0 ,
> and they all point to /redhat-5.1 which doesnt exist .. and the versions
> are not
> the ones that 5.0 comes with ...
> however there is no mention of 5.1 anywhere else ...
> there
