ent provider, by all means switch; but expect to lose a day now
and then no matter what, until computer science is a lot more mature
than it is today.
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
> Sent: Tuesday, Dec
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Michael,
>
> There are TONS of messages on the net (some from Alan Cox which seems to
> know what he is talking about) about the fact that the gcc 2.96 is NOT a
> release, that it produces broken kernel. It is easy to find on
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Michael,
>
> There are TONS of messages on the net (some from Alan Cox which seems to
> know what he is talking about) about the fact that the gcc 2.96 is NOT a
> release, that it produces broken kernel. It is easy to find on the net :
> search f
ecember 05, 2000 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more and WARNING
Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
>
> I respond to myself as it seems that it is a well known pb with RH 7.0 .
> the shipped version is bugged !
What makes you say this? Be specific.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Philippe Moutarlier
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more
Well,
I don't know how you could compile this code at all. I went
Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
>
> I respond to myself as it seems that it is a well known pb with RH 7.0 .
> the shipped version is bugged !
What makes you say this? Be specific. I've had no trouble using RH7, and I've
now compiled the kernel several times, so I'm inclined to suspect that som
k now...
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" pbs ... more
Yuck. Well, what about trying to install the kernel from a
of these distribs which
> seem
> to get worse and worse every time :=(
>
> Any help about fixing these pbs without re-installing from scratch (I did
> an update)
> would be very very welcome.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PR
as always been somehow a big
pain as soon as you have any custom stuff going on
Philippe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael R. Jinks
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 "upgrade" p
I ran into this problem yesterday. If your .config file is worth saving, rename
it and then do a "make mrproper", which will erase all relics of past compiles
from the source tree as well as any user-entered configuration information. Then
do a "make [x|menu]config" and re-load your .config file
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on a regular basis, I try to upgrade RH and I almost always have to go back
> to the list.
>
> Here again, I have a pretty interesting pbs :
>
> 2 times I tried to re-compile the kernel after intalling the sources.
>
> Fist pb : install
11 matches
Mail list logo
