At 7/24/2003 09:16 +0100, you wrote:
This makes Perfect sense and I thank you for the guidance
I have (somewhere) the rsync script I used to run a Red Hat mirror site.
Since I only wanted to mirror en and es languages, skip alpha
architectures, and start mirroring from the latest release back to
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:08:18 -0600
"Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, if you are transferring the whole RedHat FTP site, you can
> exclude (one by one) all the directories in /pub/redhat/linux/ (i.e. 3.0.3,
> 4.0, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.
>Also, look at the
>bandwidth limit ("--bwlimit") option, it won't limit the instantaneous
>bandwidth for transferring a single file, but it will put pauses
>between files to keep the average down.
I'm not so sure it doesn't limit bandwidth during a single file... I added
the --bwlimit option to a
At 7/23/2003 11:43 +0100, you wrote:
I have an "oppurtunity" to migrate some data from one Unix server to
another. I was going to use *nix tools to do it and had plumped for Rsync.
I have a lot of data to move (1.5Tb+ from one site and 1Tb+ from another),
but time is not an issue, reliability o
Hello All,
I haven't much experience with this but I think that NFS shouldn't be too bad for
this especially as you are doing things over time, you can do a certian portion
first then another and another , so on and so forth.
Another thing to look at is to see how site mirroring tools work, I
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Jonathan Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are you trying to do?
>
Its actually a migration from one system to another. It is a one time as such, but we
where hoping to do a base copy whilst the system is live and then eventually
disconnect a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:12:08PM +0100, Kelerion wrote:
> I'm not exactly an expert on this subject (or many others for that
> matter) but is NFS really a suitable solutions to transfering 1.5TB+ of
> data over a network?? I didn't think it was *very* stable...
Previous messages have suggested
What are you trying to do?
If you are just _moving_ the data one-time, I would probably use something
other than NFS. However, if it's a remote filesystem for Multimedia, I
would use NFS.
Jon
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Kelerion wrote:
> I'm not exactly an expert on this subject (or many others for t
I'm not exactly an expert on this subject (or many others for that
matter) but is NFS really a suitable solutions to transfering 1.5TB+ of
data over a network?? I didn't think it was *very* stable...
Just a thought
Kel
van Aswegen, Marinus (ZA - Johannesburg) wrote:
Hi Alan
There are many t
Hi Alan
There are many transfer mechanism you can use provided you have space on the
destination.
Is the information confidential ? You can try FTP, NFS or even RSYNC.
Regards,
Marinus van Aswegen
Principal Consultant
Deloitte & Touche
Security Services Group
Phone: +27-(0)11-209-6324
Fax:
Alan,
rsync should do just fine. You might want to do a --dry-run to see the
outcome. Also, check out whether or not you need to use the -Hardlinks
option which has been know to choke some big data copies.
-eric wood
Alan Harding wrote:
> Hello Chums I wonder if you could help me with a quick q
I would be interested in hearing about this as well, but on a much smaller
scale.
-- Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:43 PM
Subject: Data Migration
> Hello Chums I wonder if you
12 matches
Mail list logo
