I COULD be wrong, but I *THINK* it is the same. Ext3 is just a journaled
ext2 I think.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
> over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
> file with i
I've don't have any experience with such large files, but there was a
similar question on the Seawolf list (I think that's where it was).
Someone there posted this url:
http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html
Hope this helps,
Ben
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:35:32AM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On F
ics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.qg.com
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Carreiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; redhat lis
Well... other os's are able to get around the limitation (wintendo for
example). I'm hoping that ext3 (or just redhat 7.2 itself) doesn't
have this limitation.
>'
>
'
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:48:01AM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
>
>>> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with i
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:48:01AM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
> over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
> file with it?
>
> I believe ext2 had a limit of around 2 gigs.
It's not an ext
