RE: Postfix question

2003-10-20 Thread Mike Koponick
Alan, Thanks! That works! Mike -Original Message- From: Alan Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Postfix question On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote: > I was wondering if anyone had

RE: Postfix question

2003-10-20 Thread Cowles, Steve
Mike Koponick wrote: > I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize > in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject. > > I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix > server and use it as a relay. This is done for visiting peo

Re: Postfix question

2003-10-20 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote: > I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize > in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject. > > I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix > server and use it

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Jason Williams wrote: > > Now, if im correct, isn't something like 2.0 our? > Is the version installed with 9.0 really that far behind? Postfix 2.0 came out a day before the last RHL 9 beta shipped so it was too late to include in the final version. If y

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Lorenzo Prince wrote: It actually took me forever to find an RPM for postfix 2.0.x. The BEST place to get up to date rpms is from Simon Mudd's website. The URL is: http://postfix.wl0.org/en/ -ste -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Lorenzo Prince
It actually took me forever to find an RPM for postfix 2.0.x. The best I could come up with was 2.0.12. If anyone would like a copy, you can get it from ftp://princenet.sytes.net/software/postfix-2.0.12-1.rh9.i386.rpm HTH Lorenzo Prince Happy Red Hat 9 user ;) -- I've run DOOM more in the la

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Jason Williams
BTW, anyone running the latest version from Red Hat? Or is it best to get the latest release from www.postfix.org and install from there? Trying to weigh whether or now I should upgrade. Jason At 06:27 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, you wrote: Jason Williams wrote: Just a quick question here. I recently

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Jason Williams
Yes they are...time for a uninstall and compile from source. Jason At 06:27 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, you wrote: Jason Williams wrote: Just a quick question here. I recently installed RH 9.0 with Postfix. When I typed postconf mail_version, mine came back with 1.1.11 Now, if im correct, isn't somethi

Re: Postfix question

2003-07-18 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Jason Williams wrote: Just a quick question here. I recently installed RH 9.0 with Postfix. When I typed postconf mail_version, mine came back with 1.1.11 Now, if im correct, isn't something like 2.0 our? Is the version installed with 9.0 really that far behind? Or, have I just had a very lon

Re: postfix question

2003-01-14 Thread David Busby
The output of `postconf` shows: local_recipient_maps = unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps and alias maps is alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases man postconf shows: unix (read-only) A limited way to query the UNIX authentication database. The following tables are implemented: unix:passwd.byname T