On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 08:26, Kevin Krieser wrote:
> Of course, I am someone who went from using his Linux box as the firewall
> device to a Linksys router, because something always came up when I decided
> to upgrade the OS on my Linux box, and one time I was down for 4 days before
> I resolved the
Thanks to all the ones who answered, I thought there was no problem with
that, but the recommendation on LPR after someone said he was having
problems made me doubt a little bit..
thanks again,
juaid
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https:/
]
Subject: Re: RH as router, not recommended??
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:26:46PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
: If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better
: for obvious reasons. Other than that I can't think of any other
: reasons it would be better. Of course, having
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:26:46PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote:
: If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better
: for obvious reasons. Other than that I can't think of any other
: reasons it would be better. Of course, having less installed, means
: less to configure, and less
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, juaid wrote:
> In this days someone sayed that he did not recommend to use a RH 7.3 box
> as router, and recommended the Linux Router Project
The only reason to avoid a full-blow distro for routing and/or firewalling
is security. LRP (and similar) run in RAM, so you don't h
I'm using Redhat 7.3 as my router and firewall. Works just fine.
Anthony
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 12:55, juaid wrote:
> In this days someone sayed that he did not recommend to use a RH 7.3 box as
> router, and recommended the Linux Router Project
>
> Is this true?
> Why?
> Is it a too "heavy" dis
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:55:09PM -0300, juaid wrote:
>
> Is it a too "heavy" distribution to use as router so it does not have the
> required performance to do so?
FWIW, I set up a routeur based on Valhalla in an office a few weeks ago.
RHL 7.3 (minimal install), P133, 32Mo of RAM, 2 ISA netwo
Slightly OT - For a router setup I'm in love with freesco at
http://www.freesco.org.
Mike W
- Original Message -
From: "juaid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: RH as router, not recommended??
&g
If you mean router as in firewall type box that does simple routing,
take a look at ipcop (probably ipcop.org)it's really great.
There's nothing inherently wrong with using red hat as a router,
especially if you have a seperate firewall. The big advantge, which
could outweight any disadvanta
From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is better
> for obvious reasons.
sure
>Other than that I can't think of any other reasons it would be better.
great then, me neither, that's why I asked...
>Of course, having less installed,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:55:09PM -0300, juaid wrote:
> In this days someone sayed that he did not recommend to use a RH 7.3 box as
> router, and recommended the Linux Router Project
>
> Is this true?
Just depends ...
> Why?
If you need to fit it on one floppy disk like LRP, then LRP is bette
11 matches
Mail list logo
