on Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:56 PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/GNU/Linux/FAQs/partition.html
>
> Sorry, this goes to http://www.earthlink.net/error/404.html
!@#$%^&*() vim abbreviations.
http://km
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do I assume right that the system drive can be left out of the raid set up ???
> I want only the oracle disks (u01...u03) to participate in the raid.
System drives do not need to be in a RAID setup. You can have a single stand
alone system drive, with other drives
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
My apologies to butt in on this thread.
Do I assume right that the system drive can be left out of the raid set up ???
I want only the oracle disks (u01...u03) to participate in the raid.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubs
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/GNU/Linux/FAQs/partition.html
Sorry, this goes to http://www.earthlink.net/error/404.html
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
A
on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:02 PM -0500, Kevin Krieser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> With a "raid" controller, you probably could. Otherwise, the problem
> is that the boot drive has to be seen by the BIOS, so you can't stripe
> the OS partitions accross drives in a purely Linux software solution.
With a "raid" controller, you probably could. Otherwise, the problem is
that the boot drive has to be seen by the BIOS, so you can't stripe the OS
partitions accross drives in a purely Linux software solution.
3.6 gig is perfectly adequate for a Redhat install as long as you excercise
restraint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-Aug-2002/19:09 -0400, James Pifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I searched the archive and didn't find my answer. Is it possibly to
>install RH 7.x on a set of smaller drives, like three 1.2 gig drives,
>instead of one larger drive?
>
>I think I r
