RE: grub boot order question

2003-09-17 Thread Ian L
well i used grubby as someone suggested, and that seemed to work. Although i dont understand why i couldnt edit the conf file since thats all grubby seemed to do. I guess grubby wont make changes unless your syntax is right. But i think i can handle changing a 1 to a 0 :) ian At 02:59 PM 9/17/

RE: grub boot order question

2003-09-17 Thread Go, Jeffrey
Ian, Someone correct me if I am wrong...but you can just comment out the image you don't want it to boot to, and you should be fine.. jeff -Original Message- From: Ian L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grub boot order q

Re: grub boot order question

2003-09-16 Thread Ian L
At 05:40 PM 9/16/2003, you wrote: > this is in my grub.conf file: > if i change default=0 that should boot with the 2.4.20-20.8 kernel yes? Yes but that's not the approved way to do it. It's safer to do: grubby --set-default=/boot/vmlinuz-$version (replace $version but the version number

RE: grub boot order question

2003-09-16 Thread Otto Haliburton
After a 10 second delay. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian L > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: grub boot order question > > this is in my grub.conf file: > #boot=/dev/hd

Re: grub boot order question

2003-09-16 Thread Ian Mortimer
> this is in my grub.conf file: > if i change default=0 that should boot with the 2.4.20-20.8 kernel yes? Yes but that's not the approved way to do it. It's safer to do: grubby --set-default=/boot/vmlinuz-$version (replace $version but the version number 2.4.20-20.8 in your case). -- I