RE: rh 8 beta 233 mmx install..

2002-03-05 Thread Timothy Lee Young
I thought this wasn't actually RH 8 beta; can we stop confusing ourselves! ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: rh 8 beta 233 mmx install..

2002-03-05 Thread Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz)
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Paul Hamm wrote: > There is a reason that they call them beta. If you don't like it reinstall > 7.2 > ... and subscribe to the mailing list that Red Hat itself created for the pensacola beta. -- Nitebirdz Mozilla--> http://www.mozilla.org/ Linux XFS--> http://oss.s

RE: rh 8 beta 233 mmx install..

2002-03-05 Thread Paul Hamm
There is a reason that they call them beta.  If you don't like it reinstall 7.2 -Original Message-From: Jim Bija [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:18 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: rh 8 beta 233 mmx install.. i have tried to install rhl 8.0 beta o

Re: rh 8 beta 233 mmx install..

2002-03-05 Thread rpjday
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Jim Bija wrote: > i have tried to install rhl 8.0 beta on a 233mmx. so did my friend. > both came up with errors. i reported my bug to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 if you're talking about the new release called "pensacola", that is *not* the be