e: Re: PLEASE use meaningful
subjectlines, fer cryin' out loud!
Would it make sense to automatically send out a 'list-etiquette' message
to each and everyone who subscribe to the list?
Preferably in a different msg than the the subscription confirmation.
Something like:
===
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I can, and do use procmail to move emails from the various lists I subscribe to
> to the correct folder. That is easy. What I can;t imagine doing (well I can
> image it I guess, just not how) is writing a recipe that will parse the body and
> build a u
yes, I think this should be done (and include their password, and a
*detailed* description of how to unsubscribe).
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> Would it make sense to automatically send out a 'list-etiquette' message
> to each and everyone who subscribe to the list?
>
> Prefer
Would it make sense to automatically send out a 'list-etiquette' message
to each and everyone who subscribe to the list?
Preferably in a different msg than the the subscription confirmation.
Something like:
===
Welcome,
Please, do:
a) Use descriptive subject lines (or your
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> > And for this reason the list appears to have voted down the [RHL] being
> > added to the subject line? Logic defies me. We want better subject lines,
> > but we don't want help with the subject line.
> >
> > I'd love to have
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> And for this reason the list appears to have voted down the [RHL] being
> added to the subject line? Logic defies me. We want better subject lines,
> but we don't want help with the subject line.
>
> I'd love to have [RHL] as part of the subject line. So, e
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> Be that as it may, rpjday makes a good point. Many of us do get gobs of mail,
> and many of us are IT service types who get random mail from users all the
> time. A blank or nondescript subject line from the list looks just like same
> from a user
