> Date: 2003/08/25 Mon PM 08:18:51 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf
>
> Boom Stickity,
>
> On Monday August 25, 2003 01:19, Boom Stickity wrote:
> > Having a wierd problem. I have entries in my hosts file that I'm trying to
> > hit.
On 25 Aug 2003 17:28:01 -0700
Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:05, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>
> > Yes, but don't you hate it when you see someone posts a smug,
> > non-helpful, diatribe instead of politely working with someone
> > and requesting the information tha
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:05, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> Yes, but don't you hate it when you see someone posts a smug,
> non-helpful, diatribe instead of politely working with someone
> and requesting the information that they need? Sometimes i wonder
> what those people get out of posting to the l
Boom Stickity,
On Monday August 25, 2003 01:19, Boom Stickity wrote:
> Having a wierd problem. I have entries in my hosts file that I'm trying to
> hit. It seems when my dns proxy is unavailable it will hang the connection
> for 30 seconds even if the host is in the hosts file. Here is my
> nss
On 25 Aug 2003 16:49:50 -0700
Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:37, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>
> > I'll try to choose my words more carefully for you next time Rick ;o)
> > Perhaps you'd like to help solve the issue that we're discussing?
> >
>
> I might give it a s
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:37, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> I'll try to choose my words more carefully for you next time Rick ;o)
> Perhaps you'd like to help solve the issue that we're discussing?
>
I might give it a shot if complete, and I do mean complete, information
was ever posted. To whit, to t
On 25 Aug 2003 15:40:35 -0700
Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:22, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>
> > Ironically, the first one that comes to mind is nslookup:
> >
> > nslookup [hostname]
>
> Does that surprise you? It is neither surprising nor ironic.
> nslookup is
On 25 Aug 2003 15:40:35 -0700
Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:22, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>
> > Ironically, the first one that comes to mind is nslookup:
> >
> > nslookup [hostname]
>
> Does that surprise you? It is neither surprising nor ironic.
> nslookup is
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:22, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> Ironically, the first one that comes to mind is nslookup:
>
> nslookup [hostname]
Does that surprise you? It is neither surprising nor ironic.
nslookup is part of ISC's BIND and is written specifically to
query DNS servers, not follow system
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:07:47 -0400
Boom Stickity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it was definately a remote machine. Also using jdk 1.3.1 so I'm not sure that
> applied. I tried running strace on several command but they all seem to look at the
> nsswitch.conf first. Can you suggest a comman
> From: Sean Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/08/25 Mon PM 04:45:00 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf
>
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:25:34 -0400
> Boom Stickity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Trying to connect
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:25:34 -0400
Boom Stickity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying to connect to a weblogic port.
>
> java -Xms128m -Xmx12m weblogic.Admin -url $host:$PORT (set earlier in script)
> -username test -password test CONNECT
>
> had to change $host to $ip cause he wasn't going to h
B.S.
>
> From: Sean Estabrooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/08/25 Mon PM 03:08:41 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: nsswitch.conf
>
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:19:57 -0400
> Boom Stickity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Having a wierd
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:19:57 -0400
Boom Stickity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having a wierd problem. I have entries in my hosts file that I'm trying to hit. It
> seems when my dns proxy is unavailable it will hang the connection for 30 seconds
> even if the host is in the hosts file. Here is
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >I don't think "host" uses resolv.conf at all. It's part of the bind
> >package (bind-utils rpm), and uses its own library for DNS operations.
> >"host" will not ever try to use files or NIS, because it isn't using the
> >commo
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:37:42AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> I don't think "host" uses resolv.conf at all. It's part of the bind
> package (bind-utils rpm), and uses its own library for DNS operations.
> "host" will not ever try to use files or NIS, because it isn't using the
> common li
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>I don't think "host" uses resolv.conf at all. It's part of the bind
>package (bind-utils rpm), and uses its own library for DNS operations.
>"host" will not ever try to use files or NIS, because it isn't using the
>common libc resolver library.
Yes, Sir, you are right. It
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:08, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently changed this line from nsswitch.conf from:
> hosts: files nisplus nis dns
> to:
> hosts: files dns
>
> according to the fact that I don't run NIS at all.
If you don't use NIS, then having it in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
