Original Message -
> From: Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf
>
>
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, John Haverty wrote:
> >
> > > From: Davi
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
09/10/2002 at 05:08 PM,
"John Haverty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable
>answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible /
>scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the
Hi,
Use webmin. http://www.webmin.com
regards
Krishna
Krishna Shekhar
Network Administrator
Wiplash Wireless
- Original Message -
From: Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 a
> Fact is, someone reading a list message without knowing the tone of the
> list or the poster would see this as not helpful and obviously offensive
> at least to this poster.
I know. I was in a bad mood. I thought about it later, but once you press
'send' on the mail client it's near impossible
Hi,
Use Webmin. http://www.webmin.com
regards
Krishna
Krishna Shekhar
Network Administrator
Wiplash Wireless
- Original Message -
From: Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 a
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, John Haverty wrote:
> From: David Talkington: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wild. Seems like David's dropped the off the face of the planet. Usually
list absence is indicative of migrating to the Beta mail list. Don't
see any posts from him there either.
Back to the topic. Go t
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 19:58, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable
> answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible /
> scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the RedHat list. I
> would say this is horrible
I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable
answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible /
scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the RedHat list. I
would say this is horrible P.R. since the rank on Google is impressively
high. Mr. Tal
I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible / scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the RedHat list. I would say this is horrible P.R. since the rank on Google is impressively high. Mr. Tal
