Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS/ES/AS

2003-03-14 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:22:28AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote: > Ed Wilts wrote: > > ES is *NOT* 8.1. AS really is the former AS. ES is essentially AS > > without the clustering pieces. WS is the workstation install of AS/ES > > but has most of the server components removed. > > .. which is stil

Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS/ES/AS

2003-03-14 Thread Rick Johnson
Ed Wilts wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:57:08PM -0500, Kent Borg wrote: So what are these new distributions? Other than costing more, is ES 8.1? Is WS a workstation install of ES? (AS seems to be former Advanced Server.) ES is *NOT* 8.1. AS really is the former AS. ES is essentially AS w

Re: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS/ES/AS

2003-03-13 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:57:08PM -0500, Kent Borg wrote: > So what are these new distributions? Other than costing more, is ES > 8.1? Is WS a workstation install of ES? (AS seems to be former > Advanced Server.) ES is *NOT* 8.1. AS really is the former AS. ES is essentially AS without the c

Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS/ES/AS

2003-03-13 Thread Kent Borg
So what are these new distributions? Other than costing more, is ES 8.1? Is WS a workstation install of ES? (AS seems to be former Advanced Server.) -kb -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list