> 
> Subject: Re: Webmin
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:43:46 +0100
> From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>                 Hi Chuck,
> 
> > telnet bad!
> >
> > openssh good!
> 
>  In general I would say yes. But telnet still has it uses. I am running a
> firewall on a 486 at home, and I must say that administering it with ssh is
> really slow. The de/encrypten just asks to much of this machine. Iam going to
> put back telnet for local use!
> 
>                                         Bye,
> 
>                                         Leonard.
> 


My firewall was until recently a 486SX-33 with 12MB RAM.  OpenSSH worked
just fine - the initial connection took about a second, second and a
half, but after that there was no noticeable delay.  I would on
occaision export a tail -f console display when I was online, providing
a live on-screen display of the firewall activity.  Never noticed
anything slowing down.

IMHO it would be better to spring for a keyboard and monitor than use
telnet for your firewall box...

Cheers,

James
-- 
Semper Gumby



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to