Re: Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Trond, > > > >ROC. NAB. > "Not A Bug". And ROC? > This is expected behavior, and the reason why you don't use "-" all > the time - because you want to keep your existing paths and > environment, but just want more privileges for a task I still got a lot to learn :-). > >

Re: Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-23 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi David, Trond, > > > >ROC. NAB. > > > > WTF? > > That I can understand ;-). Anyway, Trond, could you elaborate a little on > this? "Not A Bug". > Maybe not new behaviour, but definitely good to bring to people's > atte

Re: Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, Trond, > >ROC. NAB. > > WTF? That I can understand ;-). Anyway, Trond, could you elaborate a little on this? Maybe not new behaviour, but definitely good to bring to people's attention. Like the fact that in a default setup any user can halt a machine. Probably not

Re: Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-22 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: >ROC. NAB. WTF? - -d - -- David Talkington http://www.spotnet.org PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQEVAwUBOuOza71ZYOt

Re: Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-22 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've confirmed this behavior, though I never had the problem because > my custom /etc/profile doesn't work this way. > > Follow this post's recommendation for a quick fix. > -d ROC. NAB. If you don't do "su -", you keep your environment. So what e

Redhat 7 insecure umask (fwd)

2001-04-22 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I've confirmed this behavior, though I never had the problem because my custom /etc/profile doesn't work this way. Follow this post's recommendation for a quick fix. - -d - -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:41:05 -0500 From: Dr