Sendmail Authentication

Does anyone know of a way to allow sendmail to authenticate against another source? E.g Radius, AD, LDAP _ Devon Harding System Administrator Gilat Latin America 954-858-1600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail is intended for the above named addressee(s), and may contain informati

Re: Sendmail Authentication

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:37:24PM -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote: > Does anyone know of a way to allow sendmail to authenticate against > another source? E.g Radius, AD, LDAP Please try some basic Google searches using search strings like: sendmail authentication radius se

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

Helo! I'm trying to setup the Bridge on Basic Setup following the How To: http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/HOWTO/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/set-up-the-bridge.php3   I've two NICs on Red Hat Linux 9, and, after setup I only ping 192.168.1.45 (the IP that I associated with mybridge) but not ping no

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

I believe that you have sendmail authentication working correctly. Your problem lies with the server name lookup. sendmail must be able to resolve your server's name and it will then to a reverse lookup on the resulting ip. >From you message I would guess that's the problem. Gerry

RE: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

Ronald W. Heiby wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thursday, July 24, 2003, 2:24:33 AM, Gerry wrote: >> It looks like you are using a box by the name of >> falkor.off.the-strategis.com and your mail server is > > My notebook PC is "falkor". When I am in my office, it bec

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, July 24, 2003, 2:24:33 AM, Gerry wrote: > It looks like you are using a box by the name of > falkor.off.the-strategis.com and your mail server is My notebook PC is "falkor". When I am in my office, it becomes "falkor.off.the-strategis.com. W

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

At 7/23/2003 20:27 -0500, you wrote: > What happens if you "telnet mailserver 25" and issue a "ehlo localhost"? 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN This would also seem to indicate that I should be able to use PLAIN authentication to tell sendmail that I'm an OK person. Yes. On every system I've ever used, that

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

I just checked the header of the message you sent. I've pasted in the more interesting parts below. It looks like you are using a box by the name of falkor.off.the-strategis.com and your mail server is datapotata.off.the-strategis.com. I just tried a host name lookup for your server and couldn'

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 10:14:44 PM, Gerry wrote: > Also, when you're at your client are you sure you can get through their > firewall? Perhaps you have to use their server. I don't think I can send > mail directly to my server from where I work. I ran into that for the first time at a differ

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

On 23 Jul 2003, pnelson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 16:00, Gerry Doris wrote: > > I suggest you go to linux-sxs.org and check out the sendmail > > authentication step by step. > > > > Sendmail authentication is very easy to setup but clear documentation is &

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Ronald W. Heiby wrote: > Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 7:29:37 PM, Rodolfo wrote: > > > What happens if you "telnet mailserver 25" and issue a "ehlo localhost"? > > "ehlo localhost" gives an error about it being an invalid domain name. > Getting past that, after the "pleased to

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

I'll be looking at the references supplied by others a bit later this evening. But, in the mean time... Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 7:29:37 PM, Rodolfo wrote: > Did you recreate the sendmail.cf file and restart sendmail? Yes. > What happens if you "telnet mailserver 25" and issue a "ehlo localhost

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 16:00, Gerry Doris wrote: > I suggest you go to linux-sxs.org and check out the sendmail > authentication step by step. > > Sendmail authentication is very easy to setup but clear documentation is > sometimes hard to locate. From you log files I don&#

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

At 7/23/2003 15:16 -0500, you wrote: On my office Sendmail system, the sendmail.mc contains the following lines that I believe to be related to authentication. define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A')dnl TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`EXTERNAL DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `EXTERNAL G

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

I suggest you go to linux-sxs.org and check out the sendmail authentication step by step. Sendmail authentication is very easy to setup but clear documentation is sometimes hard to locate. From you log files I don't believe you're using authentication at all. Did you setup users

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

I had to use SASL to get SMTP Auth working. The walk through I used (which was for OpenBSD) is at: http://www.backwatcher.org/writing/howtos/obsd-sendmail+sasl.html You seem to have a good understanding of what going on, so you should be able to get past the OBSD specific things. Pretty much Inst

Re: Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

Hi, On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Ronald W. Heiby wrote: Use Postfix. You will spend less time than you spent writing that mail. :) I've just spent 20 minutes in my first install -- with smtp auth. Thanks to docs. Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROT

Sendmail Authentication - I thought I had it

Hello redhat-list, I read lots of list messages and a lot of documentation, and I thought that I finally had figured out how to get Sendmail authentication set up compatibly with Windows "The Bat!" mail client. If I'm sitting in the office, I can send mail via Sendmail on the syste