On 10:38 06 Jun 2003, Jeffrey Pleau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I am a relative newbie to Linux/Unix adn am having an issue with symlinks.
| I have a system where there are files and directories in user's home
| directories that are symlinked to a mounted filesystem (read only). the
| problem
Hi
all,
I am a relative
newbie to Linux/Unix adn am having an issue with symlinks. I have a system
where there are files and directories in user's home directories that are
symlinked to a mounted filesystem (read only). the problem is
this:
If user 'Tom'
navigates to /home/tom
I wonder if there is a way in RH8 to find out where all the symlinks are?
I was thinking there might be a command somehow, through one of the utilities
such as 'find' or 'whereis', or 'locate' etc.. that might just be able to
list all the symlinks one might have on their system. Maybe
The man page for find says to use -type l
(that's the letter L in lower case.)
as in
find / -type l -print
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Ted Gervais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:SymLinks..
I wonder
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 09:51, Rick Carroll wrote:
The man page for find says to use -type l
(that's the letter L in lower case.)
as in
find / -type l -print
There is also the symlinks command that will identify problem symlinks
and show whether they are relative or absolute.
try man
/ -type l -print
There is also the symlinks command that will identify problem symlinks
and show whether they are relative or absolute.
try man symlinks
Bret
--
T.L.Gervais
Coldbrook, NS
Canada.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https
, 2003 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SymLinks..
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:12 pm, Bret Hughes wrote:
Hi Rick and Brett and others on the list. Thanks for your assistance. I
tried some of your examples here and while it works I can't quite get my head
around how I would find
: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SymLinks..
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:12 pm, Bret Hughes wrote:
Hi Rick and Brett and others on the list. Thanks for your assistance. I
tried some of your examples here and while it works I can't quite get my
I'm trying to get symbolic links to work over ftp and I can't figure it out.
It used to work in older versions of RH, but no longer. Basically, I just
want to be able to link some directories for several mounted drives into my
home directory so that I can access them when I log in. By the way,
I've noticed that some FTP clients don't use symlinks. primarly I've
seen it using cuteFTP pro via SFTP. I don't recall with regular FTP.
It may be a SFTP thing? I'm not sure.
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get symbolic links to work over ftp and I
Oops. Forgot to mention that I am now running redhat 7.3, with WuFTPd no
modifications.
--
I'm trying to get symbolic links to work over ftp and I can't figure it out.
It used to work in older versions of RH, but no longer. Basically, I just
want to be able to link some directories for
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 12:47:50PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. Forgot to mention that I am now running redhat 7.3, with WuFTPd no
modifications.
If you haven't done any mods, then you're chrooted by default. Update
/etc/ftpaccess to fit your needs.
.../Ed
--
I'm
is there a simple explanation for how symlinks are treated under
NFS? here's what i'm after.
with each release of red hat, i immediately copy the CD directory
trees under a main directory structure, but keep each CD tree separate
to distinguish between them, so i'll end up with a top level
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rpjday wrote:
available, via NFS, a red hat installation tree, if i create the
directory /7.3/RedHat/RPMS containing all the symlinks. then
a network-based kickstart client could refer to this host and
to the location /7.3, under which it would
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 19:56, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Florin Andrei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Arghhh!... I just installed a 7.3 system and played a little bit with
chkconfig, using the old chkconfig --del service syntax. :-(
chkconfig --del has *always* removed symlinks, barring bugs
Florin Andrei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
If you want something which is more like the old behaviour, you have to
run chkconfig service off, which only removes the S**service symlinks,
but leaves the K**service symlinks in place. The service is disabled,
but it also remains in the list
CTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading to RH 7 leaves broken symlinks in /usr/lib
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:52:14AM -0700, Brian Wright wrote:
After upgrading to RH 7, it left broken symlinks in /usr/lib.
Forntuneately, it didn't break any programs. Has anyon
After upgrading to RH 7, it left broken symlinks in /usr/lib.
Forntuneately, it didn't break any programs. Has anyone else had this
problem?
--Brian
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:52:14AM -0700, Brian Wright wrote:
After upgrading to RH 7, it left broken symlinks in /usr/lib.
Forntuneately, it didn't break any programs. Has anyone else had this
problem?
Yes, same thing. I believe these are all harmless AFAICT and left from
older versions
hi,
i'm having some problems when using the rename library function, when
i try to rename a file thru a link, ie. the destination directory in
pointed to by a link. The rename function seems to work ok for
links within the same partition / device - but fails with a return
code of -1 when the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i'm having some problems when using the rename library function, when
i try to rename a file thru a link, ie. the destination directory in
pointed to by a link. The rename function seems to work ok for
links within the same partition / device - but fails
VERY GOOD question : well. go back to the user space nfs.
I asked this question many times but nobody really answered it.
Nfs went backward from 5.x to 6.x in my opinion unless somebody can explain
me why it is better.
Kernel space/ vs user space should not drop functionnality, or should it
on rh5.0 I could dive into cross-partition symlinked dirs on a nfs share
since rh6.0 I cannot any more
how can Y restore the behavior ?
Claudiu
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
23 matches
Mail list logo
