soulreaver wrote:
>
> why use run a windoze web editor when you can download bluefish,
> o.k maybe you need to know how to basically code in html, but ive been
> using it
> eversince it came out and now its on version 5, i personally think its
> one of
> the best, if not the best web editors for
why use run a windoze web editor when you can download bluefish,
o.k maybe you need to know how to basically code in html, but ive been
using it
eversince it came out and now its on version 5, i personally think its
one of
the best, if not the best web editors for linux, give it a go, not
hurti
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 08:37:07AM -0700, Rob Tanner wrote:
[...]
> I don't do much pure html editing and so I don't know for sure, but you
> might check to see if Xemacs has an html-mode (mode files are hunks of
> lisp code that are downloaded and installed separately from the
> editor). Xema
> s there such a thing is a "good" wysiwyg web page editor for Linux. I
> use NetObjects on a Windoz box, but I'd like to find something
> comparable for Linux. The folks at NetObjects told me they have no
> plans on porting their product to Linux.
>
yes its called WebSphere.while I really
>
>
> > Is there such a thing is a "good" wysiwyg web page editor for Linux. I
> > use NetObjects on a Windoz box, but I'd like to find something
> > comparable for Linux. The folks at NetObjects told me they have no
> > plans on porting their product to Linux.
they prob don't have enough progr
>
>
> 1. Amya - browser/editor put out buy the Web Consortium.
> 2. IBM has ported there WebShpere stuff to Linux. That includes their server, but I
>understand a striped-down version of their HTML editor is available for free.
i'm trying WebSphere ( I have older one called TopPage but just in w
>
>
> Stay far away from those 'WYGIWYG' editors. There's been a long thread
> on this list about some of those editors (read Win editors) using a non
> standard representation of special characters, which renders the page
> almost unreadable for any user not using a Micro$oft browser, but I'm
> n
Viernes, 22 de Septiembre de 2000 05:11 a.m.
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: The best web editor
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:58:38PM +0200, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
> :Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
>
> Without a doubt, gvim, particular
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:58:38 +0200
Alessandro Coppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/ (kinda like Homesite)
http://peacock.sourceforge.net/ (just starting backup development, alpha)
I still can't find anything close
>On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alessandro Coppelli spewed into the bitstream:
>
>AC>
>AC> Hi to all.
>AC>
>AC>
>AC> Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
>
>Screem and bluefish come to mind. I personally use emacs.
>Chuck Mead, CTO, LinuxMall.com
I use asWedit. It isn't WYSIWYG, but it does
I just gotta jump in and take sides on the "My editor is better than
yours" argument ;-) (see Gustav's comment below)
For years and years, the first thing I did when I got to a UNIX box I
hadn't worked on before was to install emacs. I have always preferred
it because it's highly configura
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alessandro Coppelli spewed into the bitstream:
AC>
AC> Hi to all.
AC>
AC>
AC> Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
Screem and bluefish come to mind. I personally use emacs.
--
Chuck Mead, CTO, LinuxMall.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Public Key Available: http://
I tell ya, the best web editor I've ever used is, vi
;)
Fred Herman wrote:
> Is there such a thing is a "good" wysiwyg web page editor for Linux. I
> use NetObjects on a Windoz box, but I'd like to find something
> comparable for Linux. The folks at NetObjects to
First I'll assume that this person meant a WYSIWYG editor.
As far as I know, there are:
1. Amya - browser/editor put out buy the Web Consortium.
2. IBM has ported there WebShpere stuff to Linux. That includes their server, but I
understand a striped-down version of their HTML editor is available
Is there such a thing is a "good" wysiwyg web page editor for Linux. I
use NetObjects on a Windoz box, but I'd like to find something
comparable for Linux. The folks at NetObjects told me they have no
plans on porting their product to Linux.
Fred
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
>
> Delicate question
Delicate question. These kind of questions almost always end up in a
small 'My editor is better than yours' argumentation. :-)
On a general point: Any text editor will do a good work. If it's got
colored HTML syntax highlightning, it's a plus. That is, assuming you're
doing (all?) your HTML editi
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:58:38PM +0200, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
:Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
Without a doubt, gvim, particularly with syntax highlighting turned on.
--
Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | htt
Hi to all.
Is whis the best web pages editor for Linux ?
Alessandro
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
18 matches
Mail list logo
