Re: Daylight savings time problem

2003-06-28 Thread gregory mott
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 13:36, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:08:59AM -0300, Shaw, Marco wrote: > > 2.) Examine /etc/sysconfig/clock > > Mine reads: > > > > ZONE="America/New_York" > > UTC=true > > ARC=false > > I would change the ZONE to "EST5EDT" for the Eastern time zone. Use the

Re: Daylight savings time problem

2003-06-23 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:08:59AM -0300, Shaw, Marco wrote: > 2.) Examine /etc/sysconfig/clock > Mine reads: > > ZONE="America/New_York" > UTC=true > ARC=false I would change the ZONE to "EST5EDT" for the Eastern time zone. Use the traditional time zones that are proven. > Now, my /etc/sysconf

Daylight savings time problem

2003-06-23 Thread Shaw, Marco
Did a quick google search and couldn't seem to find this as an FAQ... I've noticed my RH7.2 systems did not properly handle daylight savings time. I found an older google article with this info: "1.) Make sure that the link, /etc/localtime -> /usr/share/zoneinfo/EST5EDT exists (will have to be

Re: TIME problem

2003-03-31 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 31-Mar-2003/14:32 +0200, "Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The has just change last week-end (France), and i wonder how it can work >and when !!! > >I saw the /etc/localtime but it's not a readable file, then I saw the >/etc/adjtime but allthought I read the manual p

RE: System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Cameron . Davidson
> Knowing there are actually two clocks running in my server, > the Linux System time and the Hardware Clock. We're trying > now to sync the System time with the hardware clock every > hour using a cron job. Why? sync which way? do you know which is more accurate? I didn't think anything use

Re: System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Desmond Foo
there's no script written on syncing the time in any cron job previously) Desmond Foo - Original Message - From: "Hiten Desai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:50 PM Subject: Re: System Time Problem > are your so

Re: System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Ravi Narwade
thanks hiten i checked time of hardware and software its remain same. and the up time of my server one day before so what would be the exactily the problem i have 180 users on the this server. ravi On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Hiten Desai wrote: > are your software and hardware clocks showing > the

Re: System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Hiten Desai
are your software and hardware clocks showing the same time ? and wht is the uptime ? Hiten. --- Desmond Foo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear All, > > I've got an IBM x230 Server here running on Redhat Linux 6.2. The > server executes a set of scheduled batch jobs everyday based on a > specif

RE: System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Banze, Andreas
I've got an IBM x230 Server here running on Redhat Linux 6.2. The server executes a set of scheduled batch jobs everyday based on a specific time set in crontab. Each time before the cron jobs are executed, the starting and the ending of the cron job execution times are captured a

System Time Problem

2002-10-17 Thread Desmond Foo
Dear All,   I've got an IBM x230 Server here running on Redhat Linux 6.2. The server executes a set of scheduled batch jobs everyday based on a specific time set in crontab. Each time before the cron jobs are executed, the starting and the ending of the cron job execution times are captured a

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-21 Thread Joe Giles
at 15:28, Teodor Georgiev wrote: > > > > > > > > use the ntpdate tool to sync your clock (I do it on every hour) with a time > > > > server. > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-21 Thread Taylor Spears
; > > > use the ntpdate tool to sync your clock (I do it on every hour) with a time > > > server. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent:

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-19 Thread Joe Giles
gt; > server. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 AM > > Subject: Time Problem > > > > > > > For some st

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-19 Thread Taylor Spears
use the ntpdate tool to sync your clock (I do it on every hour) with a time > server. > > - Original Message - > From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 AM > Subject: Time Problem >

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-19 Thread Roger Schmeits
In my case the bios time was correct by the system time was off by 7 hours. Ran the command hwclock --hctosys. thanks for the tips. Been buggin' me on how to fix it. On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 19:35, Al Sparks wrote: > While running ntp is a good thing, another thing to look at are your > hardware cl

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Al Sparks
While running ntp is a good thing, another thing to look at are your hardware clock settings. What I do when setting up a new machine is go into /etc/sysconfig/clock and set UTC=TRUE. I then run /sbin/hwclock --systohc -utc as root. You probably want UTC to be false if you've got a dua

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Aly Dharshi
If you have a RH 7.3 box the instead of using ntpdate why don't you just use the ntpd program. All you have to do is put the following line server timeserver.uleth.ca prefer Ofcourse the uleth one is locked out but nonetheless, any of the us military ones should work for you, and b

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Teodor Georgiev
Guess - I do it. sending a mail to the owner. it is said below every server. - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:47 AM Subject: Re: Time Problem > On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 00:

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Mark C
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 00:29, Teodor Georgiev wrote: > > www.google.com > > and search for a list. > find one closer to you. and its generally good polite practise to mail the owner of the site and ask their permission (99% of the time they say yes), but this is how its generally done with ntp s

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Teodor Georgiev
www.google.com and search for a list. find one closer to you. - Original Message - From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:27 AM Subject: Re: Time Problem > Ok, sounds good, what time server do you

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Joe Giles
EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 AM > Subject: Time Problem > > > > For some strange reason, when ever I reboot my server, then time never > syncs to the BIOS time. The OS time always resets the BIOS time and it > ALWAYS resets it to 2:00 am...

Re: Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Teodor Georgiev
use the ntpdate tool to sync your clock (I do it on every hour) with a time server. - Original Message - From: "Joe Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:09 AM Subject: Time Problem > For some strange reason, whe

Time Problem

2002-08-18 Thread Joe Giles
For some strange reason, when ever I reboot my server, then time never syncs to the BIOS time. The OS time always resets the BIOS time and it ALWAYS resets it to 2:00 am... Not sure why that time, but it does. Anyone know why? Im running RED HAT 7.3 with all the current updates from UP2DATE inc

Re: Time problem

2002-08-09 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Aug-2002/10:34 -0700, Dan Stromberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Actually, mutt can read html mail if you configure it to. True, but most of the HTML-only mail I receive is spam. So I file it as such. Most legitimate mail I receive include a tex

Re: Time problem

2002-08-09 Thread Dan Stromberg
Actually, mutt can read html mail if you configure it to. On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:40:39AM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08-Aug-2002/12:26 +0700, jim 77 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this pa

RE: GnuPG (was Re: Time problem)

2002-08-09 Thread Martin Mewes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anthony, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony E. > Greene Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GnuPG (was Re: Time pr

Re: GnuPG (was Re: Time problem)

2002-08-09 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Aug-2002/09:31 +0200, Martin Mewes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >No luck, but I could now send it to europe.keys.pgp.com successfully. Good. I will try to get your key from that keyserver. I agree that mutt is very hard to get started. But af

Re: Time problem

2002-08-09 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-Aug-2002/09:25 +0200, Martin Mewes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >That's because I have problems to send the key to a server. >I alyways get an "server open failed" when I try it. I am having a problem with that keyserver too. Try http://www.ke

RE: GnuPG (was Re: Time problem)

2002-08-09 Thread Martin Mewes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anthony, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony E. > Greene Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: GnuPG (was Re:

RE: Time problem

2002-08-09 Thread Martin Mewes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anthony, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony E. > Greene Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Time problem > It i

Re: Time problem

2002-08-08 Thread Daniel Senderowicz
Look at the bottom to the solution that worked for me. >> I've just install Redhat 7.3 into Pentium 4 (motherboard ASUS P4S333-VM), and >> Double Processor Pentium 3(Double Processor motherboard INTEL SAI2) , the >> problem is their time gap increase around 6 seconds / day , Anyone know what >>

Re: Time problem

2002-08-08 Thread Edward Marczak
On 08/08/02 1:26, "jim 77" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just install Redhat 7.3 into Pentium 4 (motherboard ASUS P4S333-VM), and > Double Processor Pentium 3(Double Processor motherboard INTEL SAI2) , the > problem is their time gap increase around 6 seconds / day , Anyone kno

Re: GnuPG (was Re: Time problem)

2002-08-08 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08-Aug-2002/19:42 +0200, Martin Mewes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So now I installed GnuPG in order to have a hand to sign outgoing >messages at will :-) > >"man gpg" does not give me ananswer where to send my public key. --send-keys [names]

Re: Time problem

2002-08-08 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08-Aug-2002/16:49 +0200, Martin Mewes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well here over in Germany, we are not that ware of this. >It is not a common practice to fake someone's eMail-Adress. It is not common anywhere that I know of. Some of that is becau

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-03 Thread Luke C Gavel
su -c 'date -s "8:00am"' -- Generated Signature -- Most general statements are false, including this one. -- Alexander Dumas -- End Sig -- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/re

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread John Aldrich
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001, Anthony E . Greene wrote: > On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 20:05:36 John Aldrich wrote: > >A good util is "rdate" to sync your pc clock with an atomic > >clock over the 'Net. > > The only problem with rdate for non-realtime apps is that you have to jump > through hoops to see if it fai

Re: Fun with rdate (was: HELP -- System Time problem.)

2001-01-02 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:40:48PM -0500, Anthony E . Greene wrote: > > > >Just throwing some obvious errors at it, it does return 1 in limiting > >testing. FWIW. > > That blurb is in the version that shipped with RH6.2 and I have not found an > error condition that results in a nonzero exit code

Re: Fun with rdate (was: HELP -- System Time problem.)

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 21:28:01 Hal Burgiss wrote: >On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:18:37PM -0500, Anthony E . Greene wrote: >> The only problem with rdate for non-realtime apps is that you have >> to jump through hoops to see if it failed. It _always_ gives an exit >> code of zero, no matter what errors

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:18:37PM -0500, Anthony E . Greene wrote: > On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 20:05:36 John Aldrich wrote: > >A good util is "rdate" to sync your pc clock with an atomic > >clock over the 'Net. > > The only problem with rdate for non-realtime apps is that you have > to jump through h

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 20:05:36 John Aldrich wrote: >A good util is "rdate" to sync your pc clock with an atomic >clock over the 'Net. The only problem with rdate for non-realtime apps is that you have to jump through hoops to see if it failed. It _always_ gives an exit code of zero, no matter what

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread John Aldrich
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001, John N. Alegre wrote: > I am running RedHat 6.1/6.2 on two towers and a Think Pad. Both the towers > switched the year just fine, but the laptop booted Monday morning with a date > in 1999 and a time seven hours off. I used the control-panel time machine and > changed the da

Re: HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Burger
Your laptop's system clock is behind. Once you set the time again, open up a command prompt, and, as root, run "hwclock systohc" to set the hardware clock. On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, John N. Alegre wrote: > I am running RedHat 6.1/6.2 on two towers and a Think Pad. Both the towers > switched the year

HELP -- System Time problem.

2001-01-02 Thread John N. Alegre
I am running RedHat 6.1/6.2 on two towers and a Think Pad. Both the towers switched the year just fine, but the laptop booted Monday morning with a date in 1999 and a time seven hours off. I used the control-panel time machine and changed the date and time and selected "Set System Time". Afte

Re: APM time problem.

2000-06-17 Thread David Talkington
Check your apmd startup script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd), and ensure that it's running with the -u switch (man apmd). Change your hardware clock to store GMT and display your local timezone (easiest way is to run "setup" as root, do "timezone configuration"). Finally, run /sbin/setclock. I've ha

APM time problem.

2000-06-16 Thread Erik de Groot
I have an interesting PM problem with my lnotebook... it is a TTX but I think it can be compared to a Dell Inspiron(sp?). When I put the laptop into suspend mode from within X it shutsdown fine but when I bring it back to life my clock loses 6 hours. It only happens the first time I suspend a

Re: System Time Problem!

2000-05-23 Thread Anthony E. Greene
At 12:31 2000-05-23 +0430, Redhat Mailing List wrote: >After some days since soft and hard clock were sync'ed using >'date' and 'setclock', it is seen a two minutes differnce >between them (soft one is late). > Is there any bug with time keeping part of linux or i should >sync them manually ,using

System Time Problem!

2000-05-23 Thread Redhat Mailing List
Hi Here is a problem with the time system of Linux Mandrake 6.1. After some days since soft and hard clock were sync'ed using 'date' and 'setclock', it is seen a two minutes differnce between them (soft one is late). Is there any bug with time keeping part of linux or i should sync them manua

Pause during boot/Time problem

2000-05-02 Thread Barnett Hsu
Hi. These problems didn't exist in RHL 4.2 and 5.2, but when I upgraded my 166 MHz Pentium to 6.1, I discovered some problems I can't figure out. Upgrading to 6.2 didn't fix these problems. 1. When the kernel is booting, there will sometimes be a long pause after displaying the drive

Date/Time problem

1998-04-09 Thread Michael Cervantes
For some reason, on boot-up RH5.0 sets the date to the previous day (e.g., today it would set it to Sunday the 5th.) When I set it to the proper time, it just resets it on the next boot-up. I have already created a symlink b/w /usr/share/zoneinfo and /usr/lib/zoneinfo as per the RH5.0 product er

Re: Date/Time problem

1998-04-09 Thread Pat Hennessy
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Michael Cervantes wrote: > For some reason, on boot-up RH5.0 sets the date to the previous day (e.g., > today it would set it to Sunday the 5th.) When I set it to the proper > time, it just resets it on the next boot-up. I have already created a > symlink b/w /usr/share/zo

Obscure Time Problem

1998-03-31 Thread George Toft
Machine: 686/166 48M RAM 1.2G HD RedHat 5.0 - Linux 2.0.32 fvwm2 (AfterStep lookalike) Problem: Clock is off by 10 hours, but right on time!?! At xterm, date command yields correct time. Time Machine and asclock show correct time. Time stamps are correct. Apache show UTP time as local time w

RE: Correct time problem... RH5.0

1998-03-09 Thread Kevin H. Devin
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Chuck Mead wrote: I just looked through the errata on 5.0... LIKE I SHOULD HAVE DONE IN THE FIRST PLACE. I created the static link... All works fine now. My appologies for cluttering the list. Chuck, I do appreciate your speedy response though. I intend to check out tha

RE: Correct time problem... RH5.0

1998-03-09 Thread Chuck Mead
Got to http://www.moongroup.com/unix/linux_stuff.html and have a look at the Quick Tips... the fix is there! On 09-Mar-98 Kevin H. Devin wrote: > I just upgraded from 4.2 to 5.0 this morning. Everything went > extremely smooth. I was very impressed. > > There was one problem though... I'm us

Correct time problem... RH5.0

1998-03-09 Thread Kevin H. Devin
I just upgraded from 4.2 to 5.0 this morning. Everything went extremely smooth. I was very impressed. There was one problem though... I'm using afterstep as my WM and asclock displays the time as GMT even though everything else is set to PST (-0800). Anyone have any clue as to what is causin