> Hello, we recently upgrade a quad processor apache web server from 7.2 =
> to 9. since we have noticed a significant loss of performance. Pages =
> that were taking 1-2 seconds to generate are now taking 2-4 seconds. =20
You don't say how the pages are being generated. It could be unicode
relat
Hi Tom,
> Hello, we recently upgrade a quad processor apache web server from 7.2 to 9.
> since we have noticed a significant loss of performance. Pages that were taking
> 1-2 seconds to generate are now taking 2-4 seconds.
>
> Has anyone else noticed this or is it related to apache 2 vs 1?
Ge
t: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrade from 7.2 to 9 performace loss
> Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > I think you just have to accept that newer means slower, but more
> > features (or eye-candy, as the case may be).
>
> That might be true of a desktop install, but s
Edward Dekkers wrote:
I think you just have to accept that newer means slower, but more
features (or eye-candy, as the case may be).
That might be true of a desktop install, but should NOT be true of a
server install. If that gets slower, then it's time to find a different
distriution.
-ste
Linuxwhat wrote:
Hello, we recently upgrade a quad processor apache web server from 7.2
to 9. since we have noticed a significant loss of performance. Pages
that were taking 1-2 seconds to generate are now taking 2-4 seconds.
Has anyone else noticed this or is it related to apache 2 vs 1?
Hey
Hello, we recently upgrade a quad processor apache
web server from 7.2 to 9. since we have noticed a significant loss of
performance. Pages that were taking 1-2 seconds to generate are now taking 2-4
seconds.
Has anyone else noticed this or is it related to
apache 2 vs 1?
Thanks tom
