Re: architecture specific rpms

2003-01-23 Thread Mertens Bram
Hi, Well I rebooted to my old kernel, replaced the i386-kernel and the i386 glibc-packages and evrything seems fine: [M8ram@localhost M8ram]$ rpm -qa --qf "%{name}-%{version}-%{release} is for %{arch}\n" | egrep "kernel|glibc" | sort compat-glibc-6.2-2.1.3.2 is for i386 glibc-2.2.5-42 is for i686

Re: List archives confusion (was: Re: architecture specific rpms)

2003-01-22 Thread mklinke
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 16:22, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists/ > > It's the old "Red Hat Mailing List Archives" page which is > hopelessly out-of-date, but still linked at the bottom of: > http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/ I suspect that this is the archiv

Re: architecture specific rpms

2003-01-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22 Jan 2003 17:20:37 +0100, Mertens Bram wrote: > Perhaps a dumb question, but would I have to reboot first and boot the > previous kernel before deleting the newer i386 and installing the > newer i686 kernel? > Or can I (while running kernel 2.4.1

List archives confusion (was: Re: architecture specific rpms)

2003-01-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:05:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Sorry, I try to be careful about distributing e-mail addresses, > > > that one didn't get my attention. However, your e-mail is still > > > included in the archives, whether it is quo

Re: architecture specific rpms

2003-01-22 Thread Mertens Bram
> From: Michael Schwendt > > Should I upgrade? can I even do this without problems? I mean won't > > rpm complain that kernel-2.4.18-19.7.x is already installed? or does > > it check the architecture as well? > > It would complain, but you still have the older kernel installed. > That means, you c

Re: architecture specific rpms (was: timezone settings)

2003-01-22 Thread mklinke
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 14:06, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > Sorry, I try to be careful about distributing e-mail addresses, > > that one didn't get my attention. However, your e-mail is still > > included in the archives, whether it is quoted or not... > > No, it isn't. The mailing-list

Re: architecture specific rpms (was: timezone settings)

2003-01-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22 Jan 2003 14:44:39 +0100, Mertens Bram wrote: > > Please do not quote e-mail addresses. They make it into the archives > > where -- even after a long time -- address collectors can still > > harvest them for bulk e-mail address listings. > > Sorr

Re: architecture specific rpms (was: timezone settings)

2003-01-22 Thread Mertens Bram
> From: Michael Schwendt > Please do not quote e-mail addresses. They make it into the archives > where -- even after a long time -- address collectors can still > harvest them for bulk e-mail address listings. Sorry, I try to be careful about distributing e-mail addresses, that one didn't get my