Re: are my spam rules working?

2000-03-09 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> So my question is this. What does "NOQUEUE: Null connection from > acacia.mediahub.com.sg [203.126.200.20]" actually mean? They dropped the connection without saying anything to the SMTP server. Connect, and disconnect. Igmar -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsub

RE: are my spam rules working?

2000-03-08 Thread Scott Kindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (snip) > telnet mail-abuse.org [you have to execute this from the mailserver] > > It'll run a test back to your server and connect to the sendmail port. > It'll put your computer through something like 17 different tests. The > one kink I found is t

Re: are my spam rules working?

2000-03-08 Thread Glen
on 3/6/00 6:53 AM, Scott Kindley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I run logcheck and have noticed what appeared to be mail neing relayed > by my machine. So I blocked the offender via /etc/hosts.deny and listed > the IP and domain in linuxconf to disallow relaying from them also. I thought by defaul

Re: are my spam rules working?

2000-03-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 06:53:55AM -0500, Scott Kindley wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | I run logcheck and have noticed what appeared to be mail neing relayed | by my machine. So I blocked the offender via /etc/hosts.deny and listed | the IP and domain in linuxconf to

are my spam rules working?

2000-03-06 Thread Scott Kindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I run logcheck and have noticed what appeared to be mail neing relayed by my machine. So I blocked the offender via /etc/hosts.deny and listed the IP and domain in linuxconf to disallow relaying from them also. So...logcheck reports this: Security V