[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is it standard to use -755 nobody.nobody as ownr.group for all their
> .html's on their web page ?
No, it's bad, because the "nobody" account is for use by services that
support anonymous users, and the *last* thing you'd ever want is for
an anonymous user to modify yo
I mean in production /var/www/html rather than development.
There is no editing there.
Some links will let some users start an applet to tunnel thru to tomcat
"Anthony E. Greene" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09-Oct-2002/18:10 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-Oct-2002/18:10 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is it standard to use -755 nobody.nobody as ownr.group for all their
>.html's on their web page ?
No. The owner and group should be set according to who is authorized to
edit the page.
--Tony
-
Hi All.
Is it standard to use -755 nobody.nobody as ownr.group for all their
.html's on their web page ?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
