No problem.
Enjoy.
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Craig Iffelberg wrote:
> Thank you so much.
>
> Greatly appreciated :)))
>
>
> On Tuesday 08 October 2002 11:16 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Yup...you want to add:
> >
> > "smptd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> > hash:/etc/postfix/spammer_list
Thank you so much.
Greatly appreciated :)))
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 11:16 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> Yup...you want to add:
>
> "smptd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> hash:/etc/postfix/spammer_list"
>
> to the /etc/postfix/main.cf file
>
> I happened to call it spammer_list, but yo
Yup...you want to add:
"smptd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/spammer_list"
to the /etc/postfix/main.cf file
I happened to call it spammer_list, but you can call it whatever you want.
The format of the text file is:
spammerdomain.com 550 Reason for bouncing the spa
Hey, would you know how to enable bounce
feature in Postfix?
I snooped docs, and nothign found.
I know how to do it in sendmail, via the /etc/mail/access file,
but I can't find it in Postfix, if this Postfix is so much
better, then perhaps I should use it?
Thank you.
Craig
On Tuesday 08 Octobe
Maybe he meant 6.0.
-Original Message-
> This a RH5.2 running the 2.2.5 Kernel from the 6.1 distro.
??? 6.1 comes with 2.2.12. Did you upgrade everything, or just the
kernel?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
the console terminals
(hmm, go figure).
Turns out that some home my /etc/sysconfig/networkscripts/ifcfg-lo file had
been nulled out. I noticed the "lo" device didnot show up on the "ifconfig".
I redone the file and everything started working okay agian.
Juha Saarinen wrote:
> I can't ping the local host, and the kernel is dumping the message
> "neighbor table overflow" all over the console when I use the network.
> I can ping other machines. ANd other machines can ping the
> mchn3.ohiocounty.net.
It's supposedly a bug in early 2.2.x kernels that happens when you try
Hi,
I can't ping the local host, and the kernel is dumping the message
"neighbor table overflow" all over the console when I use the network.
I can ping other machines. ANd other machines can ping the
mchn3.ohiocounty.net.
[root@mchn3 log] ping mchn3.ohiocounty.net
neighbour table overflow
ping
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Pottol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: hmm
>All true, it is just that not everyone has it yet, and if you like me, set
>your default font just barely large e
>>Speaking of flames, some of us (ok, just me, for all I know), have a thing
>>about not liking html in email.
>
>
>I think we're gonna have to give that one up. It does nicely solve the
>problem of "rich" email with a cross-platform, nearly universal markup
>language.
>
>It's not the best possib
>Well I am a new linux user. I was wondering what you guys think is the best
window manager?? I would need >one that doesnt use up much ram also.
someone recently mentioned that they still use twm. I used it about six
years ago. In a nutshell, you drive it by clicking on the desktop and
bringing
>-Original Message-
>From: Ronald Pottol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sunday, May 31, 1998 12:00 PM
>Subject: Re: hmm
>>Speaking of flames, some of us (ok, just
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Pottol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, May 31, 1998 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: hmm
>Speaking of flames, some of us (ok, just me, for all I know), ha
Just though I'd say I agree on the HTML in email. I use pine, and its
not worth my time to view the attachment. So people, please, don't use
HTML in your email, it is just a waste of time. Just my opinion ;)
Bryan
|Speaking of flames, some of us (ok, just me, for all I know), have a thin
Trying to start a flame war, or what?
I think the question is, best at what? I mean, I kind of like wmx
(http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/), on my 640x480 screen notebook, but
in a non-ram/pixel (it is actually a little heavy on the cpu though)
constrained environment, I'd want one with more
Well I am a new linux user. I was wondering what
you guys think is the best window manager?? I would need one that doesnt use up
much ram also.
???
--
Henrik Edlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Naturally they became heroes."
Leia Organa of Alderaan, Senator
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat
On Sat, 4 Apr 1998 18:35:45 +0200 (CEST), Henrik Edlund wrote:
>???
I'm still working on it. I'll announce it when I'm done. Please be
patient.
Mike
---
Mike Wangsmo, QA Manager Red Hat Software,In
18 matches
Mail list logo
