yn Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:56:10AM -0500, Brian Ashe wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2002 11:39, you said something about:
> > First off I'd like to say thanks for the help everyone, I tried a few
> > things, and am now pretty sure it's my VIA chipset / motherboard. The
> > first thing I did was
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:08:21PM -0500, Dean MacIsaac Jr. wrote:
> DAMN!!!
>
> OK so the 0 0 0 in swap is bad... I'm currently at work and cannot recall
> what it said exactly in the partition area of the install... but swap was
> there at 384 MB, as well as / and /boot I think.
I had this p
DAMN!!!
OK so the 0 0 0 in swap is bad... I'm currently at work and cannot recall
what it said exactly in the partition area of the install... but swap was
there at 384 MB, as well as / and /boot I think. Are they virtual
partitions? I really want to run with this, but if it's this slow, I'll
Dean MacIsaac Jr.,
On Tuesday 12 February 2002 11:39, you said something about:
> First off I'd like to say thanks for the help everyone, I tried a few
> things, and am now pretty sure it's my VIA chipset / motherboard. The
> first thing I did was begin the install so I could setup a swap Parti
First off I'd like to say thanks for the help
everyone, I tried a few things, and am now pretty sure it's my VIA chipset
/ motherboard. The first thing I did was begin the install so I could
setup a swap Partition. However... Linux had already done
that. When the install got to the par
