"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Trond,
>
> > > Did this change with RedHat 7?
> >
> > We didn't ship it before.
>
> ??? It's on powertools 6.2. Well, not 3.23.33 of course, but 3.20.32a.
We didn't ship it in main.
The powertools version is very old
Hi Trond,
> > Did this change with RedHat 7?
>
> We didn't ship it before.
??? It's on powertools 6.2. Well, not 3.23.33 of course, but 3.20.32a.
Bye,
Leonard.
"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Trond,
>
> > > Another question on the subject: Shouldn't/couldn't RedHat setup the mysqld
> > > to run as user mysql?
> >
> > It does (I'm the one who makes those).
>
> Did this change with RedHat 7?
We didn't ship it
Hi Trond,
> > Another question on the subject: Shouldn't/couldn't RedHat setup the mysqld
> > to run as user mysql?
>
> It does (I'm the one who makes those).
Did this change with RedHat 7?
Bye,
"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Trond,
>
> > Nah, -U would install them anyway. That being said, I think sticking
> > with our RPMs instead of the ones from mysql.com would be a good advice.
>
> Sticking with the RH rpm's indeed is a good idea. At least
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
>
> What I ment to say is that MySQL* translates to all packages, in an undefined
> order. The other packages on the line are thus already installed by the firs
> MySQL*. So I guess it should have been something like MySQL-*. Right?
Ac
Hi Jack,
> Hi, Leonard. rpm -U reverts to -i action if it sees no prior version installed.
Yes, you are right. I confused -U and -F. This is a very important
difference, which I really shouldn't forget. It will save me a lot of trouble
if I don't :).
> Try it. And yes, your
Hi Trond,
> Nah, -U would install them anyway. That being said, I think sticking
> with our RPMs instead of the ones from mysql.com would be a good advice.
Sticking with the RH rpm's indeed is a good idea. At least using the spec
files from the RH rpm's (at least as far as path
jb1 wrote:
> Hi, Leonard. rpm -U reverts to -i action if it sees no prior version installed.
Future RPMers make note of this and then use the -F option when
upgrading. This quite possibly will bite you in the rear end someday as
you think, "Gee, I have all these updated rpms in this directory,
"Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jack and Corisen,
>
> > rpm -e mysql-devel
> etc.
> >
> > then use rpm -Uvh to install the new rpms.
>
> How would the upgrade succeed if all the rpm's have been removed? You'ld need
> -i instead of -U in this case.
Nah
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Jack and Corisen,
>
> > rpm -e mysql-devel
> etc.
> >
> > then use rpm -Uvh to install the new rpms.
>
> How would the upgrade succeed if all the rpm's have been removed? You'ld need
> -i instead of -U in this case.
>
> >
Hi Jack and Corisen,
> rpm -e mysql-devel
etc.
>
> then use rpm -Uvh to install the new rpms.
How would the upgrade succeed if all the rpm's have been removed? You'ld need
-i instead of -U in this case.
> rpm -Uvh MySQL*rpm
I think this first * would include all needed pac
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Corisen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install the lastest version of mysql 3.23.33 rpm
> (downloaded from mysql.com) on RH7 using the command "rpm -Uvh MySQL*"
> but encountered "failed dependencies error" as shown below:
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> MySQL-DBI-perl
Hi,
I'm trying to install the lastest version of mysql 3.23.33 rpm
(downloaded from mysql.com) on RH7 using the command "rpm -Uvh MySQL*"
but encountered "failed dependencies error" as shown below:
error: failed dependencies:
MySQL-DBI-perl-bin is needed by MySQL-bench-3.23.33-1
mysql = 3.23.2
14 matches
Mail list logo
