On 17 May 1998, Peter Mutsaers wrote:
> We just bought some SUN Ultra's with Solaris 2.6. The Ultra's have
> only 64MB of RAM, but still I find them very efficient.
It's a bit of an exaggeration to say that Solaris requires 128MB to do
anything useful, it runs very nicely in 64MB, maybe 32MB if
I wrote:
> I beg to differ. Solaris has a huge bloated inefficient pig
> of a kernel as compared to Linux. They do wacky things like
Peter Mutsaers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> We just bought some SUN Ultra's with Solaris 2.6. The Ultra's have
> only 64MB of RAM, but still I find them very ef
>> On 16 May 1998 05:14:23 -, Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ES> "Chuck Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The only reason linux is so popular is it is free and most of the
>> software is free. Solaris has a far more robust kernel
ES> I beg to differ. Solaris has a
"Chuck Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only reason linux is so popular is it is free and most of the
> software is free. Solaris has a far more robust kernel
I beg to differ. Solaris has a huge bloated inefficient pig of a kernel
as compared to Linux. They do wacky things like allow in
