Re: lfs kernels ?

2000-09-05 Thread Giulio Orsero
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:56:04 +0200 (CEST), you wrote: >There is now in the redhat distribution tree a directory updates/6.2EE, with >kernel names xxx-2.2.16-4.lfs.i386.rpm >Of course, there is no README in that directory telling what is it, and no more >in the kernel-doc rpm. > >lfs sounds like "l

Re: lfs kernels ?

2000-09-05 Thread pierre . frenkiel
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Gustav Schaffter wrote: > My (unqualified) guess would be Large File System, i.e. including the > patch to handle files bigger than 2GB in size. this seems to be another valid solution! I heard about some work in progress on a journalized file system, and thought that "lf

Re: lfs kernels ?

2000-09-05 Thread Gustav Schaffter
Pierre, My (unqualified) guess would be Large File System, i.e. including the patch to handle files bigger than 2GB in size. Regards Gustav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is now in the redhat distribution tree a directory updates/6.2EE, with > kernel names xxx-2.2.16-4.lfs.i386.rpm > Of co

lfs kernels ?

2000-09-05 Thread pierre . frenkiel
There is now in the redhat distribution tree a directory updates/6.2EE, with kernel names xxx-2.2.16-4.lfs.i386.rpm Of course, there is no README in that directory telling what is it, and no more in the kernel-doc rpm. lfs sounds like "linux file system", but can anybody tell me more ? -- Pierr