We get at least 40-50 attempts per day like that. Most are port scans
and such... So far, knock on wood, we havent had any trouble, and seem
to be doing well using a mix of iptables/portsentry/
Honestly tho, these repeated scans and attemps from Korea and China and
other places that foster th
Gordon Messmer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
210.90.225.193 and 202.56.215.25. I can still ping these ips. How
can I inform the system administrator of respective ips?
Use "whois " to find contact info for the address. The first of
those is a Korean address, and you're unlikely to find anyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
My server RH 7.0 (soon upgrading to 8) has been again hacked vi ftp .
Don't upgrade; do a clean install. Copy over your data files, and set
up each service again (don't blindly use the config files or password
files from the hacked machine).
210.90.225.193 and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
My server RH 7.0 (soon upgrading to 8) has been again hacked vi ftp . It has been
twice and the process is same. They login via ftp (anonymous) user. Chkrootkit
program shows ifconfig, ls, netstat, ps, syslogd, tcpd, top, rexedcs infected. Using
'last |grep conn
On 05/29/03 12:58 -0400, Jeff Lane wrote:
>
> 1: format and reinstall this machine
...with Red Hat 9!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
More importantly is what he said originally... "My server RH 7.0 (soon
upgrading to 8) has been hacked AGAIN vi ftp."
This makes me wonder... first off, hes running 7.0. Has he or the admin
bothered with keeping the machine up to date with errata and secuirty
patches? Next, that makes me ask
Why don't you just use SSH and be done with it!
Why use FTP? So 2 decade ago!
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 14:56, Joe Giles wrote:
> Or, better yet, use an FTP daemon that is secure and not the stock one
> that comes with RedHat (WU-FTP?):-P. I use ProFTPD and I have not had
> one problem as of yet
Or, better yet, use an FTP daemon that is secure and not the stock one
that comes with RedHat (WU-FTP?):-P. I use ProFTPD and I have not had
one problem as of yet (Knock on Wood), however, I do like the idea of a
chroot jail :-D..
Thanks
Joe
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 05:57, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
On 29-May-2003/16:53 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>My server RH 7.0 (soon upgrading to 8) has been again hacked vi ftp . It
>has been twice and the process is same. They login via ftp (anonymous)
>user.
Do you really need to allow anonymous FTP from all over the Internet? If
you don't need this
Hi all,
My server RH 7.0 (soon upgrading to 8) has been again hacked vi ftp . It has been
twice and the process is same. They login via ftp (anonymous) user. Chkrootkit
program shows ifconfig, ls, netstat, ps, syslogd, tcpd, top, rexedcs infected. Using
'last |grep connected' command, I found 2
10 matches
Mail list logo
