Denis Jacobi wrote:
So I either have to patch the kernel for acl support or to change the
allowed group number or think of something other. I'm really
disappointed in linux having this "user in only 32 group" limitation.
AFAIK, it's not an uncommon limitation. Furthermore, some Unix
protocols lik
Cliff Wells wrote:
> I just talked to a friend of mine. He informs me that if you're
using
> XFS or EXT3 with ACL support then you can do:
>
> chown -R
> chmod 700
> setfacl -R -m u:apache:r
>
> on the virtual host directories. The user will then own the
directory
> and it will be unreadable
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:58:27 +0200
"Denis Jacobi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff Wells wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > > Cliff Wells wrote:
--->snip
>
> :-) I thought I descriebed the problem pretty good using Bob and
> Emma.
>
> Well, sadly there is a more se
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:58, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> :-) I thought I descriebed the problem pretty good using Bob and Emma.
Oh, we see the problem alright .
> Well, sadly there is a more serious background to my problem. In my
> case Bob is the apache webserver.
That bastard.
> I installed a new
Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> > >
> > > However, consider the pros and cons:
> > >
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> > >
> > >
Jeff Kinz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you sea
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:10, Ed Wilts wrote:
>
> It's getting obvious we're talking about Microsoft Bob here. The last I
> heard, he was a felon wanted in 36 states. Dead or Alive. Preferably
> dead.
But only 32 states are actually aware of it...
--
David Hollister
Furthurnet - Free, legal P
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> > >
> > > However, consider the pros and cons:
> > >
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive n
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:57:48PM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> > Cliff Wells wrote:
> > > Firing Bob:
> > > - Easy.
> > > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> > >
> > > Working around group limit:
> > > - Hard.
> > > - Will ma
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 13:43, John Nichel wrote:
> Cliff Wells wrote:
> > Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
> >
> > However, consider the pros and cons:
> >
> > Firing Bob:
> > - Easy.
> > - Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
> >
> > Working around group limit:
> > - Har
Cliff Wells wrote:
Fine. Discount *all* my suggestions ;)
However, consider the pros and cons:
Firing Bob:
- Easy.
- Indicates a decisive nature. Your boss will like that.
Working around group limit:
- Hard.
- Will make you look bad while you search for a solution.
Also, you should try to focus
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 12:33, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:22:32PM +0200, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> > I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> > have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> > another group (emma) and added the user (bo
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:22:32PM +0200, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
> should now be able to rea
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 12:22, Denis Jacobi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
> have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
> another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
> should now be able to read fi
Hi,
I stumbled over a problem which I can't seem to solve. On my machine I
have a user (bob) which is a member of 33 groups. Now I created
another group (emma) and added the user (bob) to the group emma. Bob
should now be able to read files where group emma has read permission
on. The problem is t
15 matches
Mail list logo
