re: CPUs revisited

1998-04-08 Thread GateKeepeR News
Ahh, but the PII is actually just a transitional piece, made to fill in the time between the P classic and the next chip. Not to mention it just sucks compared to all the hype about it. On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Larry Lade wrote: |At 09:16 a 04/08/98 +1000, you wrote: |>>I am trying to find out if th

re: CPUs revisited

1998-04-08 Thread Db
>I am trying to find out if the Pentium ll series wuld be a better bet >to say a Pentium Pro 20 Correct me here if wrong, but hasn't the devel of the PentiumII been slated as discontinued by intel?? cheers!! DB -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! htt

Re: CPUs revisited

1998-04-08 Thread Jack Hatfield
Subject: re: CPUs revisited >At 09:16 a 04/08/98 +1000, you wrote: >>>I am trying to find out if the Pentium ll series wuld be a better bet >>>to say a Pentium Pro 20 >> >>Correct me here if wrong, but hasn't the devel of the PentiumII been >>slated as d

re: CPUs revisited

1998-04-08 Thread Larry Lade
At 09:16 a 04/08/98 +1000, you wrote: >>I am trying to find out if the Pentium ll series wuld be a better bet >>to say a Pentium Pro 20 > >Correct me here if wrong, but hasn't the devel of the PentiumII been >slated as discontinued by intel?? Certainly not. The Pentium Pro, not the Pentium II, ha