RE: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-26 Thread Rev. David P. Giffen
e 200 of _Linux Journal They have a interesting article called "We Talk to Everybody" It's kinda of a Who's Who in the Linux world. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 05:23 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-09 Thread Victor R. Cardona
Red Hat is a Linux distribution. It uses a slightly modified version of the Linux kernel. All distributions do this. Eventually, the modifications end up in the regular kernel maintained by Linus. www.redhatisnotlinux.org is merely pointing out that Red Hat is not the only distribution of Linux av

RE: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-09 Thread Martin Bartlett
On 08-May-00 int27h opined: > Well, Long time ago I heard that rh don't have the same kernel like the > rest > linux distro, and just days ago i got a www.redhatisnotlinux.org > mentioning that rh has gone to be an independent os using gnu distro? > > comments? Redhat tend to use kernels that a

RE: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-08 Thread Uncle Meat
On 08-May-00 Michael J. McGillick opined: > Hatters: > > I actually took the time to go to the site. It is well laid out and not > what it first appears to be. The old saying "Don't judge a book by its > cover ..." comes to mind. I am a long-time Red Hat user, and think that > RPM makes sense

RE: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-08 Thread Michael J. McGillick
Hatters: I actually took the time to go to the site. It is well laid out and not what it first appears to be. The old saying "Don't judge a book by its cover ..." comes to mind. I am a long-time Red Hat user, and think that RPM makes sense, but I also agree with a lot of what this sight has to

Re: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-08 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:18:38AM -0700, int27h wrote: > Well, Long time ago I heard that rh don't have the same kernel like the rest > linux distro, and just days ago i got a www.redhatisnotlinux.org > mentioning that rh has gone to be an independent os using gnu distro? Hm, I don't quite see w

Re: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-08 Thread Hyung Kim
I had RH 6.1 with kernel 2.2.12. I just recompiled kernel 2.2.14 from SuSE and intalled it into my RH system. Everything works fine, including all my modules and networking services. --- int27h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, Long time ago I heard that rh don't have the > same kernel like th

RE: redhat is not linux?

2000-05-08 Thread Uncle Meat
On 08-May-00 int27h opined: > Well, Long time ago I heard that rh don't have the same kernel like the > rest > linux distro, and just days ago i got a www.redhatisnotlinux.org > mentioning that rh has gone to be an independent os using gnu distro? > > comments? RH uses a linux kernel with the p

redhat is not linux?

2000-05-07 Thread int27h
Well, Long time ago I heard that rh don't have the same kernel like the rest linux distro, and just days ago i got a www.redhatisnotlinux.org mentioning that rh has gone to be an independent os using gnu distro? comments? Thx -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the