Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
>>Hi list,
>> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
>>RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
>>The problem i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
> RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
> The problem is that when I try to inst
Hi list,
I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of RH6.2.
The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that. The
problem is that when I try to install the popt stuff I get:
[root@bohr src]# rpm -Uvh popt-1.6.3-1.03.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
Hi Erik,
Whether you decide to go to 3.0.6 or 4.x, read a message that Jeff
Johnson at Redhat posted to the RPM list a while back Read it a few
times.
http://www.execpc.com/~bgkuhn/linux/upgrade_to_rpm_4.html
I helped me dig myself out of a hole after I screwed up the RPM 4
install.
T
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> Convert your RPM database to db3 format
Ok,
I did install db3 when I upgraded, it was one of those dependency
issues. Could someone enlighten me on how to convert my rpm database to
db3?
Thanks so much,
Erik
___
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Erik Mathisen wrote:
> Hi,
> I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
> download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
> upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
> tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but
Hi,
I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but it didnt fix the problem, still no packages
install
>Greetings!
>Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect >to this
>error message?
>[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
>failed dependencies:
>libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
It gives you the cause. Update libcrack. Of, one good hint : Never log out
wh
Greetings!
Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect to this
error message?
[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
failed dependencies:
libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
Also, I can't login as one of the users I've created and I think it's
because of th
I was here the last couple of weeks asking for advice on how to upgrade some
of my packages. I was having problems with installing/upgrading some rpms.
I burned all the rpms I was having problems with onto a CD and then tried
glint, and everyting worked perfect. I couldn't install from the comm
10 matches
Mail list logo
