On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:07:53PM +0100, gregory mott wrote:
> by the way, why is redhat dropping bzip2?
Huh? RH uses bz2 by default for its uploads internally, I believe.
This sounds like misinformation.
--
Jack Bowling
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Mar 2003 16:07:53 +0100, gregory mott wrote:
> i have just discovered rsync (thanks to a redhat-list poster for
> pointing it out) and it is very good.. actually it is half of what i've
> been wanting.. the other half is (an option) to compres
i have just discovered rsync (thanks to a redhat-list poster for
pointing it out) and it is very good.. actually it is half of what i've
been wanting.. the other half is (an option) to compress (preferably
bzip2) each file on transmission (iff that results in a reduction in
size) and store it sti
