RE: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-19 Thread Jamin Collins
something is thought to be fool proof, someone makes a better fool. Jamin W. Collins -Original Message- From: Vidiot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-19 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Steve Frampton wrote: When every minute of my day is precious, the time spent weeding the mail spool adds up. But if you are an "IT service type", surely your list mail isn't arriving in the same mail folder as your customer mail? Surely you're using procmail? Ok.

someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Nic Steussy
Per the topic, subject line says it all. duke out rpjday wrote: i know, for sure, that i'm going to get flamed for this, but for cripes' sakes, will some of you please use subject lines that actually mean something? i get 100-200 emails a day, almost all technically-oriented, and i

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Michael R. Jinks
Hrm. Be that as it may, rpjday makes a good point. Many of us do get gobs of mail, and many of us are IT service types who get random mail from users all the time. A blank or nondescript subject line from the list looks just like same from a user. One I can ignore or put off; the other I

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Michael McLeod
It would be helpful to have "subjects" which could be a very short synopsis of the content. Michael Nic Steussy wrote: Per the topic, subject line says it all. duke out rpjday wrote: i know, for sure, that i'm going to get flamed for this, but for cripes' sakes, will some of you

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Joe Brenner
Nic Steussy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer That would be yourself you're referring to? Rpjday just posted a reminder about basic netiquette, that's all. Gotta be done, once in a while.

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:20:36AM +0900, Steve Frampton wrote: On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Michael R. Jinks wrote: Be that as it may, rpjday makes a good point. Many of us do get gobs of mail, and many of us are IT service types who get random mail from users all the time. A blank or

Re: someone has a short fuse: Re: PLEASE use meaningful subject lines, fer cryin' out loud!

2000-09-18 Thread Vidiot
Be that as it may, rpjday makes a good point. Many of us do get gobs of mail, and many of us are IT service types who get random mail from users all the time. A blank or nondescript subject line from the list looks just like same from a user. One I can ignore or put off; the other I must