-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josep M. wrote:
| Hello.
|
| No,is included,as you can see,and installed by default in my case:
|
I'm talking about the entry in /etc/shells, not whether /bin/false exists.
Thanks,
- -Rick
- --
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Adminis
Hello.
No,is included,as you can see,and installed by default in my case:
[root@mail bin]# rpm -qf /bin/false
sh-utils-2.0.12-3
Josep
Begin of Quote Rick Johnson :
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Josep M. wrote:
>| Hello.
>|
>| My rh 8.0 includes /bin/false !!!
>|
>
>Did y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josep M. wrote:
| Hello.
|
| My rh 8.0 includes /bin/false !!!
|
Did you put it in there?
I checked all of my RH 8.0 and 7.3 servers and they only include the
following:
/bin/sh
/bin/bash
/sbin/nologin
/bin/bash2
/bin/ash
/bin/bsh
/bin/tcsh
/bin/csh
Hello.
My rh 8.0 includes /bin/false !!!
Josep
Begin of Quote Rick Johnson :
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Rupendra Singh wrote:
>|>>Set their shell to /sbin/nologin instead of /bin/bash
>|>>
>|>>Using /sbin/nologin vs. /bin/false retains FTP functionality
>|>>since /sbin/no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rupendra Singh wrote:
|>>Set their shell to /sbin/nologin instead of /bin/bash
|>>
|>>Using /sbin/nologin vs. /bin/false retains FTP functionality
|>>since /sbin/nologin is considered a valid shell for FTP daemons
|>>which require this functionality. S
>> Set their shell to /sbin/nologin instead of /bin/bash
>>
>> Using /sbin/nologin vs. /bin/false retains FTP functionality
>> since /sbin/nologin is considered a valid shell for FTP daemons
>> which require this functionality. See /etc/shells for the
>> listing (as of RH 8.0).
>
> its Ok IMAP POP