On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:50, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > I don't know if apt-get gets you non-Red Hat apps though. Never
> > checked. Never needed to.
>
> Yes it does. freshrpms.net and other apt repositories provide quite a
> wealth of otherwise difficult to install packages.
Last time I filled a surv
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 13:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> > up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
> > the update is availably through up2date).
> > apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't ha
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:34, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> > up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days
> > after the update is availably through up2date).
> > apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> up2date gives you updates very fast (mirrors update quite a few days after
> the update is availably through up2date).
> apt-get is great for getting aplications that you don't have installed!
up2date is great for getting applicati
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 17:12, Tom Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone know if there are any problems with using up2date and apt-get
> together? Do they step on each others toes? Could you possibly use
> up2date to keep up on the system and use apt to just install new
> packages?
Hi all,
Anyone know if there are any problems with using up2date and apt-get
together? Do they step on each others toes? Could you possibly use
up2date to keep up on the system and use apt to just install new
packages?
TIA
--
Tom Wilson
Reg. Linux user# 199331
--
redhat-list mailing
