Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

"David D.W. Downey" wrote: > > Charles Galpin wrote: > > > > and if you are going to bad mouth my beloved emacs, then please > > refrain from blasphemy when speaking of it. > > > > The proper wording should be "large POS" > > > > :) > > ROTFL, I stand corrected. It is a "large POS". >;-) Humph.

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

nope, once you run the rpm you have to go to /boot and take the new entry, vmlinuz-2.2.14-5.0, and change it's corresponding entry in /etc/lilo.conf. then rerun lilo and your gold. see what you said. :Does this upgrade the kernel and reconfigure lilo to boot the new :kernel?

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

Does this upgrade the kernel and reconfigure lilo to boot the new kernel? John On 04/02/00, 04:28:28PM -0400, jack wallen jr wrote: > i'm sure others have done this already but i wanted to report that i > upgraded my home machine to 6.2 one piece at a time. it only took me an > hour or so but i

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

Charles Galpin wrote: > > and if you are going to bad mouth my beloved emacs, then please > refrain from blasphemy when speaking of it. > > The proper wording should be "large POS" > > :) ROTFL, I stand corrected. It is a "large POS". >;-) -- David D.W. Downey Red Hat Certified Engineer

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

and if you are going to bad mouth my beloved emacs, then please refrain from blasphemy when speaking of it. The proper wording should be "large POS" :) On Sun, 2 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "David D.W. Downey" wrote: > > > I remove the extra... ...the emacs lisp source code and > > u

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

"David D.W. Downey" wrote: > I remove the extra... ...the emacs lisp source code and > usually can get around another 100MB of space back. (Around 120 to 125 > if I remove emacs as well, since I hate that little POS). Awww geez... did you have to bring up religion here?!? :-) -- mozilla Be Cou

Re: upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

jack wallen jr wrote: > > i'm sure others have done this already but i wanted to report that i > upgraded my home machine to 6.2 one piece at a time. it only took me an > hour or so but i dl'd, letter of the alphabet at a time, each package > and rpm -Uvh'd them until i was finished. the upgrad

upgrading to 6.2 a different approach

i'm sure others have done this already but i wanted to report that i upgraded my home machine to 6.2 one piece at a time. it only took me an hour or so but i dl'd, letter of the alphabet at a time, each package and rpm -Uvh'd them until i was finished. the upgrade was flawless and now i have 6.2