Once bitten, twice shy. I was hit with the Ramen Worm, so I've avoided WU-FTP
since. You're point is well taken, however.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:56:53 -0600
Subject: Re: w
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:20:58PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> While also a challenge for logins ProFTP is a better choice over WU-FTP. WU-
> FTP is a common victim of exploits.
I believe that last security exploit in wu-ftpd was the glob exploit.
This affected ProFTP as well.
Given that wu-ftpd i
While also a challenge for logins ProFTP is a better choice over WU-FTP. WU-
FTP is a common victim of exploits.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Randy Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:39:52 -050
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:33:06PM -0500, Lon Lentz wrote:
>
> I can't seem to find one How-To that fully explains what is necessary to
> set wu-ftpd (2.6.2-5) up for real or guest accounts. The package was
> installed at the time I installed the OS. I had to change it to start at
> boot. I have
@Redhat. Com
Subject: wu-ftp set up
I can't seem to find one How-To that fully explains what is necessary
to
set wu-ftpd (2.6.2-5) up for real or guest accounts. The package was
installed at the time I installed the OS. I had to change it to start at
boot. I have used the KDE interface for se
I can't seem to find one How-To that fully explains what is necessary to
set wu-ftpd (2.6.2-5) up for real or guest accounts. The package was
installed at the time I installed the OS. I had to change it to start at
boot. I have used the KDE interface for setting up accounts but I can't seem
to g
