Re: Regex to escape .

In message 25854083.p...@talk.nabble.com, Harsha1 writes: I want to know how to escape dot(.) from being acting as universal character. ... So i want to right regex which will take (dot) as dot only not as any other character. I'm not a jakarta-regexp user, but the usual way is to escape a

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.4

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vadim Gritsenko writes: and vote for a release. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jakarta-regexp CVS down?

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ramesh Babu Mandava writes: I am facing problem in checking out jakarta-regexp module. Is there any problem with CVS server? It was migrated to Subversion. You can check out from: http://svn/http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/regexp/trunk/ I guess there was

Re: [VOTE] Migration to SVN

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Yandell writes: If you could +1 the vote Daniel just so we can achieve at least some In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Yandell writes: +1 I guess I voted before the actual vote, eh :) Here's my formal +1. daniel

Re: Migration to SVN?

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Henri Yandell writes: Anyone mind if I put together a vote and request to infrastructure to migrate the regexp module from CVS to SVN? +1 (caveat: I'm not a regexp committer) - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.3

+1 I'm cc'ing the PMC and including the entire message so it has an opportunity to exercise oversight. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vadim Gritsenko writes: Hi all, Previous release, 1.2, was made in November 2000 [1], and I think it's time to make a Regexp 1.3 release. I propose to make it

JDK 1.4 java.util.regex comments

The folks working on JSR-051 have asked us for feedback about the java.util.regex package. I have yet to find the time to write up my comments, but if some of us can get back to them before the Community Review period expires (Oct 8), there's a chance java.util.regex may see some improvements.

Re: \d{0,4} doesn't work?

In message 3B4D69EE.5486.762A4F2F@localhost, Michael McCallum writes: I like Daniels idea of the posix compliance. I thought the original goal of regexp was to implement POSIX expressions, but I may be wrong. What do you see as the main tasks necessary to fold regexp in as the posix pac kage?