The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Organization Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)'
(draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-11.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Registration Protocols Extensions Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adam
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Organization Mapping'
(draft-ietf-regext-org-12.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Registration Protocols Extensions Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adam Roach, Alexey
Please take the time to select the documents you support for advancement
in this working group.
https://doodle.com/poll/6nyguby3yr8dx9cp
Please select from 1-5 documents.
If you click once in the box a green check mark will appear. Use this
to indicate support for a document. If you click t
Jim,
The IDN Table draft is of general applicability, but it is a true dependency
for moving the idnmap draft forward. I am not requesting for the IDN Table
draft to be a working group document at this time.
Thanks,
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 21, 2018, at 9:52 AM, James Galvin wrote:
Included below is the final list of documents to be considered for
adoption and the establishment of a milestone (date by which the
document will be submitted for publication). For those documents that
are already working group documents we will only need to establish a
milestone.
There are
Patrick,
I want to thank you for your detailed and thorough comments.
First let me say that this working group has a small set of active
participants, less than 10 at most and less than 5 on average. So,
you’re not in a minority since every voice is quite important to this
working group.
S
Thanks for this Jim. I’ve removed IDN Table Mapping but I have a
question for you.
If that document is tightly coupled with the “idnmap” document, why
are you keeping it “active” (last updated two months ago) when the
“idnmap” document is expired (3 years ago)?
Thanks,
Jim
On 10 Dec 201
On 20/12/18 1:01 AM, Gould, James wrote:
>
> Your proposed Privacy Considerations section and much of your proposed Human
> Rights Considerations section focuses on the interface of the VSP, which is
> out-of-scope for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode. The scope of
> draft-ietf-regext-verifi
