Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with COMMENT)

Roger The positive/negative still seem strange to me even after your detailed explanations. But, if the WG agrees, then I am fine with Thank you for your reply -éric From: iesg on behalf of Roger D Carney Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2019 at 16:43 To: The IESG , "regext@ietf.org" Subject:

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Eric, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>>

Re: [regext] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Yoav, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> Sent:

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Benjamin, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker