If Figure 28 is not intended to be a full example, then it should likely
use the "..." notation to indicate that better. This notation is used
for example in Figure 21 or Figure 25 however it is not consistently
used in all examples.
Kind regards,
Pawel
On 14.06.24 15:15, Gavin Brown wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Brown
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 9:15 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; a...@hxr.us; superu...@gmail.com;
> orie@transmute.industries; gal...@elistx.com; i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [Techni
Hi Scott,
> On 14 Jun 2024, at 13:38, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gavin Brown
>> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 8:32 AM
>> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
>> Cc: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; a...@hxr.us; superu...@gmail.com;
>> orie@transmute.industries; gal...@elistx.co
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Brown
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 8:32 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; a...@hxr.us; superu...@gmail.com;
> orie@transmute.industries; gal...@elistx.com; i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ext] [Techni
Hi Scott,
> On 12 Jun 2024, at 17:42, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to reject this report. The example cited in Figure 28 is
> described in the text as a "common response body", not a complete RDAP
> response. The error response body is described in the context of a complete
> RDA
