Mudit, may you use the updated kernel 2.4.3-12 in the RH 7.1 updates
directory?
The stock 2.4.2 kernel w/ RH 7.1 doesn't even work w/ certain hardware
configurations. (It's not for lack of a driver, but for a lack of a working
driver!)
If you're doing certification/qualification tests, etc., y
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Vats, Mudit wrote:
> The ReiserFS download page states that it's dangerous to use the ReiserFS
> with kernel 2.4.3 or older 2.4.x kernel versions. For several reasons we
> must use RedHat 7.1 with the included 2.4.2 kernel. It is our desire to use
> ReiserFS.
Eh, there is a 2
Folks,
The ReiserFS download page states that it's dangerous to use the ReiserFS
with kernel 2.4.3 or older 2.4.x kernel versions. For several reasons we
must use RedHat 7.1 with the included 2.4.2 kernel. It is our desire to use
ReiserFS.
Q1: What are the specific issues which are problematic
Hello,
> Where can I find a Quota patch for linux kernel version 2.4.10 ? I couldn't
> find it at the NAMESYS site. All I found there was the patch for 2.4.7.
I have patches for -ac versions of kernel. My lastest patch is for 2.4.10-ac3
at:
ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/pub/local/jack/quota/
Hi,
I'm curious, is there any of the developers doing regular tests of reiserfs
with recent kernels under Cerberus?
VA Linux's testsuite is probably good at detected load-dependend
filesystem-corruption bugs.
Dirk
> --On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 03:47:43 PM +0400 Nikita Danilov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >I've just added link to Jan Kara's quota patches to our download
> >page. You can try them.
>
> I can't find them anywhere, could you please post a link to these patches?
Just a note: Curren
En mar, 2001-10-09 a 07:32, Clement escribio:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just set up a box with RH 7.1, updated with Linux Kernel 2.4.10, compiled
> with reiserfs and raid support.
>
> I can define RAID-1 partitions and 'mkreiserfs /dev/md0' and mount/umount
> the partition with no trouble at all. Ho
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Clement wrote:
> FYI, this is the content of /etc/raidmd0
>
> # cat /etc/raidtab
> raiddev /dev/md0
> raid-level 1
> nr-raid-disks 2
> persistent-superblock 0
> chunk-size 8
> device
Clement wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for you response. However, when I did that, I get this
> error message:
>
> # raidstart /dev/md0
> /dev/md0: Invalid argument
>
What kernel says?
#raidstart /dev/md0
#dmesg
Edward.
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 07:32, Clement wrote:
> I just set up a box with RH 7.1, updated with Linux Kernel 2.4.10, compiled
> with reiserfs and raid support.
>
> I can define RAID-1 partitions and 'mkreiserfs /dev/md0' and mount/umount
> the partition with no trouble at all. However, once I reboot the
Didi Rieder writes:
> --On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 03:47:43 PM +0400 Nikita Danilov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I've just added link to Jan Kara's quota patches to our download
> > page. You can try them.
>
> I can't find them anywhere, could you please post a link to these
--On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 03:47:43 PM +0400 Nikita Danilov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just added link to Jan Kara's quota patches to our download
> page. You can try them.
I can't find them anywhere, could you please post a link to these patches?
Didi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> About 2 minutes into "runalltests.sh" on ltp, ac kernels after 2.4.10-ac7
> give a message like:
On what file-system ltp runs?
>
> Oct 9 01:55:09 rushmore kernel: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer
> Oct 9 01:55:09 rushmore kernel: VFS: brelse: Trying
I had something like this with LVM on IDE disks.. The IDE driver was
loaded as a module and probably didnt init things properly..
I found that trying to use the volume just didnt work however if I
accessed the physical disk first ( eg dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null etc..
) things started working...
Thank you very much for you response. However, when I did that, I get this
error message:
# raidstart /dev/md0
/dev/md0: Invalid argument
FYI, this is the content of /etc/raidmd0
# cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
per
Suse 7.1 kernel 2.4.4
My system locked up today, and spat the dummy. Upon reboot I got a
kernel panic unable to mount rootfs.
I was able to get back in using the Suse rescue disk but unable to
mount any of my partitions. I ran REISERFSCK.
REISERFSCK 2000
ReiserFS version 3.5.29
Will read-only
Clement wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just set up a box with RH 7.1, updated with Linux Kernel 2.4.10, compiled
> with reiserfs and raid support.
>
> I can define RAID-1 partitions and 'mkreiserfs /dev/md0' and mount/umount
> the partition with no trouble at all. However, once I reboot the mac
Sumit Kalra writes:
> Hi,
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sam Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I had this problem, almost exactly. The problem ended > up being that I
> had bad ram. Do a google search for
> > memtest86 and try it out
>
> I tested my RAM using memtest86 bu
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I had this problem, almost exactly. The problem ended > up being that I
had bad ram. Do a google search for
> memtest86 and try it out
I tested my RAM using memtest86 but found it to be OK. The problem seems to
be so
Hi
Daniel wrote:
> Got an oops this morning on one of our production servers:
>
> SMP Box, stock 2.4.10 kernel all modules compiled in except ethernets.
> ksymoops output follows:
>
> ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.10. Options used
> -v /usr/src/linux/vmlinux (specified)
> -k /proc/ksym
20 matches
Mail list logo
