[reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS vs ext2

2001-11-26 Thread Niklas Höglund
I did some testing to compare ext2 and reiserfs, and found out the same thing that has been pointed out in this thread (on the Sylpheed mailing list). The test I used was 'rgrep Subject: Mail *'. I found out that in my original mail folder on a reiserfs partition this command took about two

Re: [reiserfs-list] mount -o notail of SuSE root filesystems?

2001-11-26 Thread Manuel Krause
On 11/26/2001 05:32 PM, Nikita Danilov wrote: Chris Mason writes: On Monday, November 26, 2001 12:39:23 PM +0300 Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there something that mounts my root partition regardless of any fstab setting? Does someone have any

[reiserfs-list] current state of reiserfs, patches needed with current kernel, lvm, quotas, nfs?

2001-11-26 Thread Lars O. Grobe
Hi reiserfs-people! A description of the current state of reiserfs in linux might be very nice...? I installed reiserfs some months ago, and I know that a lot of things changed, so I would really like to get a statement on the integration of reiserfs in recent Linux and on how much patch-work

Re: [reiserfs-list] Reiserfs, LVM and Quota

2001-11-26 Thread Lars O. Grobe
Hi Erik! Erik Tews wrote: So, I first ask if there is somebody with working lvm and quota-support or if anybody had the same problem. If I am the first one who is trying to get quota working on reiserfs on lvm, then I will try to give you some more debug-informations. I use a kernel

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.15 (final) + RFS A-N (2.4.15-pre8) running fine, here.

2001-11-26 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 26, 2001 20:25 +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote: SunWave1 /usr# chattr -R -SAadiscu .badattr/ Actually the better thing is chattr -R = .badattr SunWave1 /lib/modules# lsattr 2.4.15-pre7-preempt/ lsattr: No such file or directory While reading flags on 2.4.15-pre7-preempt//build The

[reiserfs-list] (fwd) Re: [reiserfs-list] [TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.5.0

2001-11-26 Thread Dirk Mueller
A-sched-yield.patch This patch fixes typo in fs/reiserfs/journal.c that inadvertently cleared some flags from current process scheduler policy bitmask, for example, silently converting real-time processes to normal ones. looks okay. why isn't it submitted ?