Re: 640.0 GB symlink

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:02:38PM -0800, Jason Mancini wrote: > Should I just erase and remake the symlink? Yes, that would be the simpliest thing. > It wasn't like this in July (my last backup, *cough*). Then somebody corrupted it, or may be even the drive itself. reiserfsck is gener

Re: 640.0 GB symlink

2002-12-04 Thread Jason Mancini
I had an issue with my RAM settings a couple months ago (swapped in a new XP processor, reset the BIOS, and chose 333MHz accidentally on DDR2100...) so most likely it's from that little incident. I redid the symlink and nothing exploded -- at least yet! >=] Thanks for such a great fs, Jason Man

reiserfsprogs-3.6.5-pre1

2002-12-04 Thread Vitaly Fertman
Hi all, The new pre version is available at our ftp site: ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre It includes speedup for pass0, which becomes quite important for hignly fragmented object id maps, and a few fixed bugs: - bug in balancing code led to abort when a leaf could be viewed as a block

non volatile ram devices

2002-12-04 Thread Russell Coker
I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir mail spools. They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and using ReiserFS for everything that's important. At this stage it is impossible for me to replace disks, RAID controllers, or anything else rea

Re: non volatile ram devices

2002-12-04 Thread Ragnar Kjørstad
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir > mail spools. They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and > using ReiserFS for everything that's important. One thing you might consid

Re: non volatile ram devices

2002-12-04 Thread Hans Reiser
Russell Coker wrote: I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir mail spools. They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and using ReiserFS for everything that's important. At this stage it is impossible for me to replace disks, RAID controllers

Re: non volatile ram devices

2002-12-04 Thread Mike Jadon
Hans, Many thanks for the referral. Russell, Our qty. 1-9 pricing is $730/unit for the 128MB card and $960/unit for the 1GB card. A driver is included the 2.4.19 kernel. Thanks, Mike At 02:05 PM 12/4/2002, Hans Reiser wrote: Russell Coker wrote: I have some servers that are giving inadeq

journal relocation

2002-12-04 Thread Brian Tinsley
Is there a patchset available for journal relocation on a 2.4 kernel (2.4.20 specifically)? I've seen reference to it in a few places but have been unable to locate it. -- Brian Tinsley Chief Systems Engineer Emageon

Re: journal relocation

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:50:52PM -0600, Brian Tinsley wrote: > Is there a patchset available for journal relocation on a 2.4 kernel > (2.4.20 specifically)? I've seen reference to it in a few places but > have been unable to locate it. Sure. Check out ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/maso

Re: non volatile ram devices

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir > mail spools. They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and > using ReiserFS for everything that's important. May I ask what ki