Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
Hi Hans, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:06:40 +0300 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Philippe, am I right in guessing that you don't need it urgently? If | so, I will let Chris do it, and it might take just a bit longer. Actually, right now, we still have that nasty bug every time we

Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:43:06AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: Actually, right now, we still have that nasty bug every time we run quotacheck that prenvent us from enabling them on several filerservers which is a big problem right now (that's on 2.4.x) Have you tried 2.4. without

Re: Core dump in reiserfsck

2003-01-15 Thread Yury Umanets
Vitaly Porotikov wrote: Folks, Perhaps 3.x1c have not this bug, but I can't do any changes in my system. I send it in hope to find some coding errors out (if this wasn't before). [root@tkprzbkup5 /root]# mount /dev/rza1 on / type ext2 (rw) none on /proc type proc (rw) none on /dev/pts type

Re: Stress test failure for reiserfs, but ext3 ok on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:35:59AM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote: I am using the attached stess.sh script (probably from this mailinglist) for creating load on a reiserfs filesystem, which forks 100 (read,write,delete) processes: # mkreiserfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /backup #

Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:46:29 +0300 Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hello! | | On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:43:06AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: | | Actually, right now, we still have that nasty bug every time we run quotacheck that prenvent us from enabling them on

Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote: | Have you tried 2.4. without Chris' datalogging patched, but with original short | overflow fix? Well, my question was more like a Plan B. I think i did, and that it still crashed, always during the quotacheck,

Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:03:36 +0300 Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The 2.4.19-presomething you had there before with just only fix I sent first | time? hmm, not the 2.4.19-presomething IIRC, it was a later kernel. I'll retry with the 2.4.19pre6 and come back to you. Thx,

Re: Stress test failure for reiserfs, but ext3 ok on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:51:00PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote: Hm. This resembles me something. Can you reproduce the same problem if you apply patches from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20/ These patches add quota support to reiserfs, but also

Re: Quotas aand 2.5.x

2003-01-15 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 04:43, Philippe Gramoullé wrote: Hi Hans, On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:06:40 +0300 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Philippe, am I right in guessing that you don't need it urgently? If | so, I will let Chris do it, and it might take just a bit longer.

Re: Stress test failure for reiserfs, but ext3 ok on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:58:04PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: I will extract relevant bits from the patch though. I will send you short version without quota once it will be ready. Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps? I tested it locally and it works

Re: Stress test failure for reiserfs, but ext3 ok on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Bernhard Sadlowski
On 15 Jan 2003 18:01, Oleg Drokin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps? I tested it locally and it works for me. If you confirm everything is ok, I will try to get it into 2.4.21 in time. At first glance it seems to work. I will run now

Re: Stress test failure for reiserfs, but ext3 ok on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:48:52PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote: Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps? I tested it locally and it works for me. If you confirm everything is ok, I will try to get it into 2.4.21 in time. At first glance it seems to

Re: reiserfsck failure

2003-01-15 Thread Bill Schrier
Unfortunatly, the console was completely hosed up and I couldn't even get any display on it to record any messages to stderr. Sorry - don't think I can help there... Bill Oleg Drokin wrote: Hello! On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:01:42PM -0500, Bill Schrier wrote: I am sending along both the

[PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX

2003-01-15 Thread Chris Mason
Hello all, I've updated the data logging patches to 2.4.21-pre3, once the suse mirror is done updating, you can download them from: ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 Changes: mount -o remount can switch between data modes. transaction overflow bug fix (BUG in

Re: How to break a reiserfs on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Zygo Blaxell
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nikita Danilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zygo Blaxell writes: In article avprcs$bfi$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Zygo Blaxell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I'm seeing a pattern of failure. ... And now I can reliably reproduce it. It has nothing to do with MD,

Re: How to break a reiserfs on Linux 2.4.20

2003-01-15 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:44:26PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote: And now I can reliably reproduce it. It has nothing to do with MD, linear, raid, SMP, or unclean shutdowns. I can reproduce this bug on a plain IDE disk partition in about three hours on Linux 2.4.20 (compiled